Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln


Date of this Version


Document Type



  1. Moed, H.F.; Burger, W.J.M.; Frankfort, J.G. and Raan, A.F.J. Van (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, 14(3), 131-49.
  2. Koganuramath, M.M.; Angadi, M. and Kademani, B.S. (2002). Bibliometric dimension of innovation communication productivity of Tata Institute of Social Science. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 7(1), 69-76.
  3. Mukherjee, B. (2010). Assessing Asian scholarly research in library and information science: a quantitative view as reflected in web of knowledge. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(1), 90-101.
  4. Larivière, V; Sugimoto, C.R. and Cronin, B. (2012), A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science’s first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 997-1016.
  5. Kaur, H. and Mahajan, P. (2012). Comparative evaluation of research output: AIIMS vs PGIMER. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 32(6), 531-36.
  6. Majhi, S. and Maharana, B. (2012). Research productivity of physical science disciplines in Sambalpur University (Orissa): a scientometric study. Researchers World, 3(4), 108-115.
  7. Beerkens, M. (2013). Facts and fads in academic research management: The effect of management practices on research productivity in Australia. Research Policy, 42(9), 1679–1693.
  8. Zyoud, SH et al. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of research productivity of Malaysian publications in leading toxicology journals during a 10-year period (2003–2012). Human and Experimental Toxicology. 33(12), 1284-1293.
  9. Jabeen, Munazza.; Yun, Liu and Jabeen, Misbah. (2015). Research productivity of library scholars: Bibliometric analysis of growth and trends of LIS publications. New Library World, 116(7/8), 433-454.
  10. Siwach, A. K. and Kumar, S. (2015). Bibliometric Analysis of Research Publications of Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak during 2000-2013. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 35(1), 17-24.
  11. Kumar, S. (2018). Scientometric study of Research productivity of ARIES, Nainital. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1680.
  12. Web of Science. (accessed on 25.05.2019).
  13. Subramanyam, K. (1993). Bibliometric Study of Research Collaboration: A Review. Journal of Information Science, 6 (1), 33-38.


The study is aimed to investigate the scientific research productivity of India’s NIRF first ranked higher academic & research institute, Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bangalore for a period of 05 years during 2014-2018. A total of 12,130 research papers were retrieved as SCIE publication from WoS bibliographical database and analyzed. The study is focused to find out the year wise institutional contribution in research, compound annual growth rate, areas of interest, collaborating institutions and countries, mode of publications, research funding agencies, prolific journals, prolific authors, authorship pattern, degree of collaborations etc. Different scientometric tools and techniques were used to analyze the data and interpretation has been done accordingly to draw out the meaningful result in evaluating the research productivity of the institute.