Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln


Document Type



  1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Retrieved from
  2. Bhagat, S., & Roshan, R. (2017). SWAYAM : Study Webs of Active-Learning For Young Aspiring Minds Making A Digital India. International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development, 4(9), 96–103.
  3. Butcher, N., & Moore, A. (2015). Understanding Open Educational Resources. Retrieved from
  4. Butcher, N. (2011). A Basic Guide to Open Educational Resources (OER), Commonwealth of Learning & UNESCO,
  5. Cole, M. T., Swartz, L. B., & Shelley, D. J. (2014). Students’ Use of Technology in Learning Course Material: Is it Cheating? International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 10(1), 35–48.
  6. Daniel, J. (2012). Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3), Art. 18.
  7. Diver, P., & Martinez, I. (2015). MOOCs as a massive research laboratory: Opportunities and challenges. Distance Education, 36(1), 5–25.
  8. Groom, C. (2013). A Guide to Open Educational Resources, JISC,
  9. Höfler, E., Zimmermann, C., & Ebner, M. (2017). A case study on narrative structures in instructional MOOC designs. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 62.
  10. How big is the online E learning industry? - Quora. (n.d.). Retrieved August 26, 2019, from
  11. Krelja Kurelovic, E. (2016). Advantages and Limitations of Usage of Open Educational Resources in Small Countries. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(1), 136–142.
  12. Poposki, D. (2010). Open Educational Resources and Open Access in Higher Education in Macedonia, 2010,
  13. Pujar, S. M., &Tadasad, P. G. (2016). MOOCs – an opportunity for international collaboration in LIS education. New Library World, 117(5/6), 360–373.
  14. Richter, Thomas & McPherson, Maggie. (2012). Open Educational Resources: Education for the World?. Distance Education. 33. 201-219. DOI:10.1080/01587919.2012.692068.
  15. Sharma, R. and Sharma, R. (2012). History of education in India. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers & Distributors.
  16. Smith, N., Caldwell, H., Richards, M., & Bandara, A. (2017). A comparison of MOOC development and delivery approaches. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(2), 152–164.
  17. Stevanović, N. (2014). Effects of motivation on performance of students in MOOC. Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Conference - Sinteza 2014, 418–422.
  18. SWAYAM. (2019). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from
  19. Swayam Central. (n.d.). Retrieved August 26, 2019, from
  20. U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Overview of the U.S. Department of Education. 313.


The Government of India initiated SWAYAM (Study Webs of Active-learning for Young Aspiring Minds), where the objective of the programme is to take the best teaching and learning resources to all with no costs. To find out the awareness and usage of SWAYAM courses among Library and Information science students, survey method of research used. To collect data from selective Universities students a structured questionnaire was prepared. The results show that most of the responses received from Annamalai University, majority respondents are aware of SWAYAM course. Respondents are aware of these courses through their teachers. 74.73% of respondents replied that their University providing orientation programme on SWAYAM. Half of the respondents prefer Word file format for submitting their assignment. More than 82% of respondents are spending 1-3 hours for SWAYAM course. Half of the respondents are agreed SWAYAM courses help to gain new knowledge and supports life-long learning. Further, the result reveals that the numbers of students continue their enrolled courses and only less number were discontinued due to some reasons