1. Gupta, B. M., and Karisiddappa, C. R. (2000). Modelling the Growth of Literature in the Area of Theoretical Population Genetics. Scientometrics, 49(2), 321-355.
2. Gupta, B.M., Kumar, S., Sangam, S.L., & Karisiddappa, C.R. (2002). Modeling the growth of world social science literature. Scientometrics, 53(1), 161-164
3. Hadagali, Gururaj., and Anandhalli, Gavisiddappa. (2015). Modeling the growth of Neurology literature. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 3(3), 45-63.S
4. Karki, M. M. S., Garg, K. C., & Sharma, P. (2000). Activity and growth of organic chemistry research in India during 1971-1989. Scientometrics, 49 (2), 279-288.
5. Neelamma, G. and Anandhalli, Gavisiddappa (2015). Research trends in Crystallography: A Study of Scientometric Analysis. International Journal of Information Sources and Services, 1 (2) pp.71-83. (ISSN: 2349-428X).
6. Ravichandra Rao, I.K. (1998). Growth, obsolescence, collaboration and circulation statistics. In Ravichandra Rao, I.K. (Ed.), Workshop on Informetrics and Scientometrics. Bangalore: DRTC.
7. Seetharam, G., and Ravichandra Rao, I. K. (1999). Growth of food science and technology literature: A comparision of CFTRI, India and the world. Scientometrics, 44(1), 59-79.
8. Tsay, M. & Yang, Y. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of the literature of randomized controlled trails. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93 (4).
The present study demonstrates the growth of Crystallography literature for the period 1989-2013. A total of 45320 records were extracted from the Web of Science Database for twenty five years which is used as main source of primary data for the present study. The growth models were applied for the literature of Crystallography. The result of the study indicates that, the Relative Growth Rate (RGR) of Crystallography publication found to be decreasing trend and Doubling Time (Dt) found to be increasing trend. The growth of literature in the field of Crystallography does not follow eithers Exponential growth and Logistic models. However, it closely follows closely the Polynomial, Power and Linear growth models. The study concluded that there has been a consistent trend towards increased growth of literature in the field of Crystallography.