Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Date of this Version
Summer 6-15-2020
Document Type
Article
Citation
A, J., & Bhat, S. &. (2016). Assessing the Effectiveness of Information Literacy Instruction Program: Pre and Post Evaluation Case Study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1434
ADINET. (2019). Retrieved 06 25, 2017, from Ahmedabad Library Network: http://www.alibnet.org
Agyeman, E. A., & Bilson, A. (2012). Research Focus and Trends in Nuclear Science and Technology in Ghana: A Bibliometric Study Based on the INIS Database. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1212. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1212
Aryanti, B. &. (2018). Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 2001 - 2006: A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 13(1), 103 - 116.
Aryanti, B., & Willet, P. (2008). Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 2001 - 2006: A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 13(1), 103 - 116.
Barik, N. a. (2019). Bibliometric portrait of select Open Access Journals in the field of Library and Information Science: A Scopus based analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2588
Batthini, G., Vaishnav, N., Madnani, A., & Chaudhary, A. (2017). The Journal of Entrepreneurship: A Retrospective Bibliometric Analysis and Future Directions. Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India.
Battisti, F. D., & Salini, S. (2013). Robust analysis of bibliometric data. Statistical Methods & Applications, 22(2), 269–283. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10260-012-0217-0
Bharucha, R., & Bhatt, B. (2013). Redefining Libraries to Create Next Generation Libraries. Librarians Day. ADINET & Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India.
Bissar-Tadmouri, N., & Tadmouri, G. O. (2009). Bibliometric analyses of biomedical research outputs in Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates (1988–2007). Saudi Medical Journal, 30(1), 130-139.
Chaudhari, B. (2019). Librarian in a new Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1920
Chun, Y. (2009). Bibliometric Analysis of Journal Articles Published By Southeast Asian Chemical Engineering Researchers. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 14(3), 1-13. Retrieved from https://mjlis.um.edu.my/article/view/6962
Cronin, B. (2001). Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 27(1). doi:10.1177/016555150102700101
Hawkins, D. (1977). Unconventional Use of Online Information Retrieval Systems: Online Bibliometric Studies. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 28(1), 13-18.
Johnson, I. M. (2011). Bibliometrics and the brain dead. Information Development, 27(2), 92–93. doi:10.1177/0266666911404012
Kim, E. (2019). Assessing the Value of Korean School Library Research: A Bibliometric Comparison of Korean and International Journal Papers. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3535
Kostoff, R. N., Río, J. A., Humenik, J. A., & García, E. O. (2001). Citation Mining: Integrating Mext Mining and Bibliometrics for Research User Profiling. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(13), 1148-1156. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.1181
Osareh, F., Mostafavi, I., & and Khazaneha, M. (n.d.). Scientific mapping of “Social Information” field in Web of Science database: a bibliometric study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3555
Pritchard, A., & Wittin, G. (1969). Statistical Bibliography: An Interim Bibliography. Journal of Documentation, 24(4), 69.
Rajaram, S. (2014). Libraries and Education Vision 2020. Librarians Day. Ahmedabad. ADINET & Gujarat University.
Shah, P. C. (2005). Sharing of Electronic Resources for Libraries and Information Centres in India Through Consortia. Ahmedabad:: ADINET & Ahmedabad Management Association.
Sin, T. (2003). Malaysian Historical Journals (1847-1966): A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 19-43. Retrieved from https://mjlis.um.edu.my/article/view/8373
Trivedi, D., & Bhatt, A. (2018). Contemporary Trends of Information Seeking Behaviour of Research Scholars of Gujarat University: A Case study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1942
Wallin, J. A. (2005). Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 97(5), 261-275. doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x
Zoogah, D., & Rigg, J. (2014). Bibliographic Analysis and Strategic Management Research in Africa. Advancing Research Methodology in the African Context: Techniques, Methods, and Designs, 10, 189-213. doi:10.1108/S1479-838720140000010009
Abstract
A Bibliometric Study of Communications Published in Journal of Informetrics from 2012 to 2016. This research study demonstrates a bibliometric study of scholarly communication published by Ahmedabad Library Network (ADINET) in proceedings of annual conference (seminar). ADINET celebrates Librarian’s Day every year to commemorate the birthday of Dr. S R Ranganathan by organizing seminar in Gujarat, a leading state of India. This bibliometric study is intended to bring out the results of seminar proceedings published by ADINET from 2005 to 2019. This study investigated 176 papers published in Proceedings of ADINET seminar during 15 years. Study revealed that most of authors prefers to write for this seminar as a single author and out of 176 research papers 119 papers are written as single author whereas 36 papers found with double author and 21 papers published with three authors. It is also found from the study that Rashmi Kumbar and Shailesh Yagnik both are prominent authors whereas Gujarat is leading state published a maximum number of papers.