Philosophy, Department of
Department of Philosophy: Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
First Advisor
Joseph Mendola
Second Advisor
John Brunero
Date of this Version
Spring 4-24-2020
Document Type
Dissertation
Abstract
This dissertation argues that the desire satisfaction theory, arguably the dominant theory of well-being at present, fails to explain why depression is bad for a person. People with clinical depression desire almost nothing, but the few desires they do have are almost all satisfied. So it appears the theory must say these people are relatively well-off. A number of possible responses on behalf of the theory are considered, and I argue that each response either fails outright, or requires modifications to the desire satisfaction theory which make the theory unattractive for other reasons.
Advisors: Joseph Mendola and John Brunero
Comments
A dissertation Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Major: Philosophy, Under the supervision of Professors Joseph Mendola and John Brunero. Lincoln, Nebraska: April 2020
Copyright 2020 Andrew Spaid