Predicting the Future of Permanent-Magnet Materials

Authors

Ralph Skomski, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Priyanka Manchanda, LMN Institute of Information TechnologyFollow
Pankaj Kumar, Kendriya VidhyalayaFollow
Balamurugan Balamurugan, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Arti Kashyap, LMN Institute of Information TechnologyFollow
David J. Sellmyer, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow

Date of this Version

7-2013

Citation

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 49, NO. 7, JULY 2013; doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2013.2248139

Comments

Copyright 2013 IEEE. Used by permission.

Abstract

There are two main thrusts towards new permanent-magnet materials: improving extrinsic properties by nanostructuring and intrinsic properties by atomic structuring. Theory—both numerical and analytical—plays an important role in this ambitious research. Our analysis of aligned hard-soft nanostructures shows that soft-in-hard geometries are better than hard-in-soft geometries and that embedded soft spheres are better than sandwiched soft layers. Concerning the choice of the hard phase, both a high magnetization and a high anisotropy are necessary. As an example of first-principle research, we consider interatomic Mn exchange in MnAl and find strongly ferromagnetic intralayer exchange, in spite of the small Mn-Mn distances.