Needle acquisition patterns, network risk and social capital among rural PWID in Puerto Rico

Authors

Ian Duncan, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Patrick Habecker, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Roberto Abadie, University of Nebraska LincolnFollow
Ric Curtis, John Jay College of Criminal JusticeFollow
Bilal Khan, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Kirk Dombrowski, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow

ORCID IDs

Ian Duncan http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9558-8542

Date of this Version

10-2017

Citation

Harm Reduction Journal (2017) 14:69. DOI 10.1186/s12954-017-0195-5

Comments

© The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Abstract

Background: People who inject drugs (PWID) take on significant risks of contracting blood-borne infection, including injecting with a large number of partners and acquiring needles from unsafe sources. When combined, risk of infection can be magnified.

Methods: Using a sample of PWID in rural Puerto Rico, we model the relationship between a subject’s number of injection partners and the likelihood of having used an unsafe source of injection syringes. Data collection with 315 current injectors identified six sources of needles.

Results: Of the six possible sources, only acquisition from a seller (paid or free), or using syringes found on the street, was significantly related to number of partners.

Conclusions: These results suggest that sources of syringes do serve to multiply risk of infection caused by multipartner injection concurrency. They also suggest that prior research on distinct forms of social capital among PWID may need to be rethought.