Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education
Date of this Version
2013
Citation
Published in International Journal of Educational Research 64 (2014), pp 107–118.
doi 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.08.006
Abstract
Explicit reasoning-and-proving opportunities in the United States are often relegated to a single secondary geometry course. This study analyzed the reasoning-and-proving opportunities in six U.S. geometry textbooks, giving particular attention to the chapter that introduced proof. Analysis focused on the types of reasoning-and-proving activities expected of students and the type of mathematical statement around which the reasoning-and-proving took place, be it general or particular. Results include the fact that reasoning-and-proving opportunities in student exercises were predominantly of the particular type, whereas textbook exposition most commonly had general statements. Within the chapters introducing proof, opportunities for students to develop proofs were less common than exercises involving conjectures and statements or exercises about the reasoning-and-proving process. Opportunities to reflect on the reasoning-and-proving process were prevalent in the introduction chapters, though rare in the remainder of the books.
Included in
Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Science and Mathematics Education Commons, Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons
Comments
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. Used by permission.