Date of this Version
Cunningham, C, (2015) Imagination: Active in Teaching and Learning (master's thesis) Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu
This autoethnography tells the story of the author’s endeavor to examine my teaching during a sculpture lesson in three 2nd grade art classes in a mid-western suburban Title I elementary school. I analyze my planning, teaching, reflecting through the lens of Stuart Richmond’s Characteristics of Imaginative Teaching as well as noted educational theorists’ conceptions of imagination and imaginative teaching and learning. These theorists include but are not limited to Maxine Greene, Kieran Egan, John Dewey, and The Lincoln Center Institute’s Capacities for Imaginative Learning. I conclude that imaginative teaching is an intentional act and that there is no formula for teaching imaginatively. I also find that imaginative teaching can involve 1) respect for students’ subjectivity and inherent nature to explore; 2) allowance of space for students to use their senses and interpretative ability; 3) thoughtfully imposed limits for students to push up against and break from conventional thought and action; and 4) collaborative learning that develops empathic appreciation for different perspectives. Additionally, I give insights on the teacher’s role in creating an environment that includes these ideas.
Adviser: Theresa Catalano
Art Education Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Elementary Education and Teaching Commons, Junior High, Intermediate, Middle School Education and Teaching Commons, Pre-Elementary, Early Childhood, Kindergarten Teacher Education Commons, Secondary Education and Teaching Commons