American Judges Association
Date of this Version
2023
Citation
Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association (2023) 59(2): 41-84
Editors: Professor Eve Brank, University of Nebraska; Judge David Dreyer, Indiana Superior Court'; Judge David Prince, Colorado State District Court
Cite as: 59 Ct. Rev. ___ (2023)
Abstract
Articles
Judicial Strategies for Evaluating the Validity of Guilty Pleas; Kelsey S. Henderson, Erika N. Fountain, Allison D. Redlich, and Jason A. Cantone
Courtroom Technology from the Judge’s Perspective: A 2022-23 Update; Fredric I. Lederer
The Science of Children’s Lies (and their Detection): A Primer for Justice Practitioners; Vincent Denault and Victoria Talwar
Jury Trial Innovation Round #2; Judge Gregory E. Mize
Departments
Editor’s Note; David Prince
President’s Column:2023, the Year of Excellence! Yvette Mansfield Alexander
Thoughts from Canada: The Supreme Court of Canada Considers How the “Plain View” Doctrine Applies to Searches of Electronic Devices; Wayne K. Gorman
Crossword:Employment Security; Vic Fleming
The Resource Page: New Thinking Podcast, Lady Justice: Women of the Court Podcast, Talk Justice Podcast; Organizations; Judicial Ethics; Let's Keep Talking: We Want Your Feedback
Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American Judges Association, invites the submission of unsolicited, original articles, essays, and book reviews. Court Review seeks to provide practical, useful information to the working judges of the United States and Canada. In each issue, we hope to provide information that will be of use to judges in their everyday work, whether in highlighting new procedures or methods of trial, court, or case management, providing substantive information regarding an area of law likely to be encountered by many judges, or by providing background information (such as psychology or other social science research) that can be used by judges in their work. Guidelines for the submission of manuscripts for Court Review are set forth on page 15 of volume 59, issue 1. Court Review reserves the right to edit, condense, or reject material submitted for publication.
Comments
Used by permission