Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, Vol. 59, No. 1

Authors

Eve M. Brank, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
David Dreyer, Indiana Superior Court
David Prince, Colorado State District Court

Date of this Version

2023

Citation

Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association (2023) 59(1): 1-40

Special issue: Artificial Intelligence

Editors: Professor Eve Brank, University of Nebraska; Judge David Dreyer, Indiana Superior Court; Judge David Prince, Colorado State District Court

Cite as: 59 Ct. Rev. ___ (2023)

Comments

Used by permission

Abstract

Articles

Being “Human” in the Age of Artificial Intelligence; Katherine B. Forrest

Ten Tips for Getting the Most Out of an Evaluation of Your ODR Program; Donna Shestowsky and Jennifer Shack

The Dilemma of Black Coding: Assessing Algorithmic Discrimination Legislation in the United States; Clarence Okoh

Securing the Integrity of Our Judicial System: Protecting Judges Beyond the Courthouse; Ron Zayas

Want to Know More About AI? Editors’ Selections: Judge ChatBot Answers All Your Questions; David J. Dreyer

Departments

Editor’s Note; David Dreyer

President’s Column: 2023--The Year of Excellence! Yvette Mansfield Alexander

Crossword: Anonymous Oft-Quoted Remark; Vic Fleming

Thoughts from Canada: Online Entrapment--A Comparison of the Approach Adopted in the United States, Canada, and Other Common-Law Countries; Wayne K. Gorman

The Resource Page: Non-Lawyers Emerging Roles in the U.S. Legal System; Assessing Equity in State Courts; Federal trade Commission Proposes to Prohibit Non-Compete Contract Clauses; Ban Peremptory Challenges?

Court Review, the quarterly journal of the American Judges Association, invites the submission of unsolicited, original articles, essays, and book reviews. Court Review seeks to provide practical, useful information to the working judges of the United States and Canada. In each issue, we hope to provide information that will be of use to judges in their everyday work, whether in highlighting new procedures or methods of trial, court, or case management, providing substantive information regarding an area of law likely to be encountered by many judges, or by providing background information (such as psychology or other social science research) that can be used by judges in their work. Guidelines for the submission of manuscripts for Court Review are set forth on page 15 of this issue. Court Review reserves the right to edit, condense, or reject material submitted for publication.