Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle with Test-Day Models with Autoregressive Covariance Structures and with a 305-d Model

Authors

R. M. Sawalha, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Jeffrey F. Keown, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Stephen D. Kachman, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
L. Dale Van Vleck, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow

ORCID IDs

Stephen D. Kachman

Date of this Version

6-6-2005

Comments

Published in Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 88, No. 9, 2005.

Abstract

This study compared genetic evaluations from 3 test-day (TD) models with different assumptions about the environmental covariance structure for TD records and genetic evaluations from 305-d lactation records for dairy cows. Estimates of genetic values of 12,071 first lactation Holstein cows were obtained with the 3 TD models using 106,472 TD records. The compound symmetry (CS) model was a simple test-day repeatability animal model with compound symmetry covariance structure for TD environmental effects. The AR_s and AR_e models also used TD records but with a first-order autoregressive covariance structure among short-term environmental effects or residuals, respectively. Estimates of genetic values with the TD models were also compared with those from a model using 305-d lactation records. Animals were genetically evaluated for milk, fat, and protein yields, and somatic cell score (SCS). The largest average estimates of accuracy of predicted breeding values were obtained with the AR_s model and the smallest were with the 305-d model. The 305-d model resulted in smaller estimates of correlations between average predicted breeding values of the parents and lactation records of their daughters for milk and protein yields and SCS than did the CS and AR_e models. Predicted breeding values with the 3 TD models were highly correlated (0.98 to 1.00). Predicted breeding values with 305-d lactation records were moderately correlated with those with TD models (0.71 to 0.87 for sires and 0.80 to 0.87 for cows). More genetic improvement can be achieved by using TD models to select for animals for higher milk, fat, and protein yields, and lower SCS than by using models with 305-d lactation records.