Improving the Nutrition and Screen Time Environment through Self-assessment in Family Childcare Homes in Nebraska

Authors

Dipti A. Dev, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Natalie A. Williams, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Iheoma Iruka, HighScope Educational Research Foundation, Ypsilanti, MIFollow
Aileen S. Garcia, University of Nebraska–LincolnFollow
Yage Guo, University of Nebraska–LincolnFollow
Irina Patwardhan, Boys Town National Research InstituteFollow
Katrina Cummings, Simpson CollegeFollow
Zainab Rida, Nebraska Department of EducationFollow
Emily Hulse, Teach a Kid to Fish, Lincoln, NEFollow
Ami Sedani, Nebraska Department of Health and Human ServicesFollow

ORCID IDs

Dipti A. Dev

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

4-2018

Citation

Dev, D. A., Williams, N., Iruka, I., Garcia, A.S., Patwardhan, I., Cummings, K., Guo, Y. A., Rida, Z. (2018) Improving the nutrition and screen time environment through self-assessment in family child care homes in Nebraska. Public Health Nutrition.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018001416

Comments

© The Authors 2018. Used by permission.

Abstract

Objective: To determine if family childcare homes (FCCH) in Nebraska meet best practices for nutrition and screen time, and if focusing on nutrition and screen time policies and practices improves the FCCH environment.

Design: A pre–post evaluation was conducted using the Go Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Childcare (Go NAP SACC).

Setting: FCCH in Nebraska, USA.

Subjects: FCCH enrolled in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP; n 208) participated in a pre–post evaluation using Go NAP SACC.

Results: At baseline, all FCCH met the minimum childcare standards for fifty-four of fifty-six practices in nutrition and screen time. After the intervention, FCCH demonstrated significant improvement in fourteen of the forty-four Child Nutrition items and eleven of the twelve Screen Time items. However, FCCH providers did not meet best practices at post-intervention. Lowest scores were found in serving meals family-style, promoting visible support for healthy eating, planned nutrition education and written policy on child nutrition. For screen time, lowest scores were reported on the availability of television, offering families education on screen time and having a written policy on screen time.

Conclusions: FCCH in Nebraska were able to strengthen their policies and practices after utilizing Go NAP SACC. Continued professional development and participation in targeted interventions may assist programmes in sustaining improved practices and policies. Considering the varying standards and policies surrounding FCCH, future studies comparing the current findings with childcare centres and non-CACFP programmes are warranted.