Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Date of this Version
Fall 8-22-2017
Document Type
Article
Citation
About Scopus. (2016).Retrieved from: https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus
Ardanuy, J. (2012). Scientific collaboration in Library and Information Science viewed through the Web of Knowledge: The Spanish case. Scientometrics, 90(3), 877–890. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0552-1
Batagelj, V., & Marvr, A. (1998). Pajek – program for large network analysis. Connections, 47–57. http://doi.org/10.1.1.27.9156
BibExcel. (2016). Retrieved from: http://www8.umu.se/inforsk/Bibexcel
Chow-White, P. A., & Green Jr, S. E. (2013). Data mining difference in the age of big data: Communication and the social shaping of genome technologies from 1998 to 2007. International Journal of Communication, 7(1), 556–583. JOUR. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84874973808&partnerID=40&md5=0273ab9e59b3a6b6aad6c143fab61dba
Darvish, H., & Tonta, Y. (2016). Diffusion of nanotechnology knowledge in Turkey and its network structure. Scientometrics, 107(2), 569–592. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1854-0
Eck, N. J. Van, & Waltman, L. (2013). VOSviewer Manual. 1 January 2013, (January), 1–28. Retrieved from http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.5.4.pdf
Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Int . J . Production Economics Green supply chain management : A review and bibliometric analysis. Intern. Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101–114. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. http://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
Frizzo-Barker, J., Chow-White, P. A., Mozafari, M., & Ha, D. (2016). An empirical study of the rise of big data in business scholarship. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 403–413. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.01.006
Gartner - IT Glossary. Big Data defintion. (available at: http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/big-data/) (accessed on: 08.03.16)
Hou, H., Kretschmer, H., Liu, Z., Ou, H. A. H., Retschmer, H. I. K., & Iu, Z. E. L. (2008). The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics. Scientometrics , 75(2), 189–202. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1771-3
Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1), 7–15. http://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(89)90102-6
Kumar, S. (2015). Co-authorship networks: a review of the literature. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(1), 55–73.
Laney, D. (2001). 3D Data Management: Controlling Data Volume,Velocity, and Variety. Application Delivery Strategies, 949(February 2001), 4. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.005
Marr, Bernard, 2015. Why only one of the 5 Vs of big data really matters? (available at: http://www.ibmbigdatahub.com/blog/why-only-one-5-vs-big-data-really-matters) (accessed on: 08.03.16)
Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2016). Analysis and visualization of large networks with program package Pajek. Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, 4(1), 6. http://doi.org/10.1186/s40294-016-0017-8
Park, H. W. (2014). An interview with Loet Leydesdorff: The past, present, and future of the triple helix in the age of big data. Scientometrics, 99(1), 199–202. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1123-4
Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday, 9–24. Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1458990/file/1458992.pdf#page=11
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. Macmillian Publishing Co. http://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:126680
Sarwar, R., & Hassan, S.-U. (2015). A bibliometric assessment of scientific productivity and international collaboration of the Islamic World in science and technology ( S & T ) areas. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1059–1077. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1718-z
Singh, V. K., Banshal, S. K., Singhal, K., & Uddin, A. (2015). Scientometric mapping of research on “Big Data.” Scientometrics, 105(2), 727–741. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1729-9
V. Batagelj, a. M. (1998). Pajek – program for large network analysis. Connections, 47–57. http://doi.org/10.1.1.27.9156
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Velden, T., & Lagoze, C. (2008). Patterns of Collaboration in Co-authorship Networks in Chemistry - Mesoscopic Analysis and Interpretation.
Wang, L., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2015). Characteristics of international collaboration in sport sciences publications and its influence on citation impact. Scientometrics, 105(2), 843–862. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1735-y
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis, Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.
What is Big Data?. Villanova University. http://www.villanovau.com/resources/bi/what-is-big-data/#.Vt7sA3pSJV0
Wu, X., Zhu, X., Wu, G.-Q., & Ding, W. (2014). Data mining with big data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 26(1), 97–107. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2013.109
Yan, E., Ding, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2010). Mapping library and information science in China: A coauthorship network analysis. Scientometrics, 83(1), 115–131. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0027-9
Zhu, L., Liu, X., He, S., Shi, J., & Pang, M. (2015). Keywords co-occurrence mapping knowledge domain research base on the theory of Big Data in oil and gas industry. Scientometrics, 105(1), 249–260. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1658-7
Abstract
Purpose: Big data, a buzzword of the present time, is a term used for extremly large data sets generated from the digital process which is not possible to analyze by traditional methods. These data sets are produced by digital devices such as smart phones, remote sensing, camera, microphones, RFID etc. The literature on big data is growing exponentially since 2011. Big data is tending to establish as a very important research field. This paper aims to explore the evolution, growth and scientific collaboration of the Indian publications in the field of big data.
Design/methodology/approach: A survey approach is used in the study while data for the study is collected from Scopus database for the year 2001 to 2015. Bibliometric analysis, visualization and mapping software are used to present the current status, growth trends and collaboration in big data research to examine its diffusion in Indian scientific literature.
Findings: We found that the big data research in India is gaining momentum and its diffusion and adoption is increasing tremendously. Conference and seminars are used to do social connect and interaction within the research community. The collaboration at institution level is found usual while collaboration at international level is low. Application of big data in health sciences and life sciences is yet to be explored in comparison to the social sciences and physical sciences.
Originality/ Value: This paper presents the growth, trends and collaboration in big data literature by the use of sophisticated bibliometric software and visualization software.