Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Title
Experimenting with the Future of American Literary Study
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
May 2006
Abstract
As digital Americanists, we are in the exciting but somewhat unfortunate position
of having to give new ideas a try. Some of us will succeed and alter the paradigms of
American literary scholarship; some of us will, like Lucius Sherman, one day look a little
ridiculous. Though I think we can trust the value of some of our digital work, like
making important but hard to find texts rigorously edited and fully accessible, we cannot
finally predict which experiments will succeed and which will fail. As academics with
tenure and review committees in our future, many of us do not feel that we have the
luxury to fail, or, more appropriately, that we do not have the luxury to have our
successes be unrecognizable to the wizened members of the committee. Therefore, it is
important that we begin to make our work, and the digital work of our peers, more fully
recognized by the profession. We need to offer one another the security to innovate, for
digital media can be a new and powerful way to discover and articulate fresh ideas about
American literature and culture.
The prospects for digital American literary study are, I think, quite good, but a
true flowering of this work will only happen when digital projects are more securely
supported by professional structures, when, for example, there are ample mechanisms for
peer review, serious considerations of digital projects in the pages of established
American literature journals, and tenure committees and departments fully supportive of
non-print publications and of thoughtful risk-taking. We do not know what will
ultimately be accepted as the most valuable kinds of digital scholarship, so we must help
create a profession that allows interesting ideas to be pursued, even if there are no
assurances for their success.

Comments
Paper delivered to the American Literature Association, Digital Americanists Panel, May 2006. Copyright 2006 Andrew Jewell.