U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska
Date of this Version
2005
Abstract
The biological control program for saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) has led to open releases of a specialist beetle (Chrysomelidae: Diorhabda elongata) in several research locations, but the controversy over potential impacts to native, nontarget plants of the genus Frankenia remains unresolved. To assess the potential for nontarget impacts under Weld conditions, we installed cultivated Frankenia spp. (primarily two forms of Frankenia salina but also including Frankenia jamesii) at locations in Nevada and Wyoming where D. elongata densities and saltcedar defoliation were expected to be very high, so insects would be near starvation with high probability of attacking nontargets if these were suitable hosts. Subsequent insect abundance was high, and only minor impact (<4% foliar damage) was observed on both forms of F. salina under these ‘worst case’ conditions; there was no impact to F. jamesii. No oviposition nor larval development were observed on any plants, there was no dieback of damaged F. salina stems, and plants continued growing once insect populations subsided. These results under ‘natural’ Weld conditions contrast with caged host-range tests in which feeding, development and minor oviposition occurred on the nontarget plant. Other ecological factors, such as distance from target plants to natural Frankenia spp. populations, inhospitable conditions for agent survival in such sites, and intrinsic insect behavior that makes colonization and/or genetic adaptation highly unlikely, lead us to conclude that nontarget impacts following program implementation will be insignificant or absent. Host range testing of new agents, while necessary to ensure safety, must put greater attention on assessing the ecological context where agents will be establishing, and on balancing speculated risks against potential benefits of biological control.
Comments
Published in Biological Control 35 (2005) 265–275.