Do cover crops increase or decrease nitrous oxide emissions? A meta-analysis

Authors

Andrea D. Basche, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
F. E. Miguez, Iowa State University
T. C. Kaspar, USDA, Agricultural Research Service
M. J. Castellano, Iowa State University

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2014

Citation

Basche, A.D., Miguez, F.E., Kaspar, T.K., and Castellano, M.J. 2014. Do Cover Crops Increase or Decrease Nitrous Oxide Emissions? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 69(6): 471-482. doi 10.2489/jswc.69.6.471

Comments

Copyright © 2014 Soil and Water Conservation Society.

This document is a U.S. government work and is not subject to copyright in the United States.

Abstract

There are many environmental benefits to incorporating cover crops into crop rotations, such as their potential to decrease soil erosion, reduce nitrate (NO₃) leaching, and increase soil organic matter. Some of these benefits impact other agroecosystem processes, such as greenhouse gas emissions. In particular, there is not a consensus in the literature regarding the effect of cover crops on nitrous oxide (N₂O) emissions. Compared to site-specific studies, meta-analysis can provide a more general investigation into these effects. Twenty-six peer-reviewed articles including 106 observations of cover crop effects on N₂O emissions from the soil surface were analyzed according to their response ratio, the natural log of the N₂O flux with a cover crop divided by the N₂O flux without a cover crop (LRR). Forty percent of the observations had negative LRRs, indicating a cover crop treatment which decreased N₂O, while 60% had positive LRRs indicating a cover crop treatment which increased N₂O. There was a significant interaction between N rate and the type of cover crop where legumes had higher LRRs at lower N rates than nonlegume species. When cover crop residues were incorporated into the soil, LRRs were significantly higher than those where residue was not incorporated. Geographies with higher total precipitation and variability in precipitation tended to produce higher LRRs. Finally, data points measured during cover crop decomposition had large positive LRRs and were larger than those measured when the cover crop was alive. In contrast, those data points measuring for a full year had LRRs close to zero, indicating that there was a balance between periods when cover crops increased N₂O and periods when cover crops decreased emissions. Therefore, N₂O measurements over the entire year may be needed to determine the net effect of cover crops on N₂O. The data included in this meta-analysis indicate some overarching crop management practices that reduce direct N₂O emissions from the soil surface, such as no soil incorporation of residues and use of nonlegume cover crop species. However, our results demonstrate that cover crops do not always reduce direct N₂O emissions from the soil surface in the short term and that more work is needed to understand the full global warming potential of cover crop management.