Cover Crop Mixture Diversity, Biomass Productivity, Weed Suppression, and Stability

Authors

A. M. Florence, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Leon G. Higley, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
R. A. Drijber, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Charles A. Francis, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
John L. Lindquist, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow

ORCID IDs

Lindquist 0000-0002-6293-7072

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2019

Citation

PLoS One (2019) 14(3): e0206195

Comments

Copyright 2019, the authors. Open access material

License: CC BY

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206195

Abstract

The diversity-productivity, diversity-invasibility, and diversity-stability hypotheses propose that increasing species diversity should lead, respectively, to increased average biomass productivity, invasion resistance, and stability. We tested these three hypotheses in the context of cover crop mixtures, evaluating the effects of increasing cover crop mixture diversity on above ground biomass, weed suppression, and biomass stability. Twenty to forty cover crop treatments were replicated three or four times at eleven sites using eighteen species representing three cover crop species each from six pre-defined functional groups: cool-season grasses, cool-season legumes, cool-season brassicas, warm-season grasses, warm-season legumes, and warm-season broadleaves. Each species was seeded as a pure stand, and the most diverse treatment contained all eighteen species. Remaining treatments included treatments representing intermediate levels of cover crop species and functional richness and a no cover crop control. Cover crop seeding dates ranged from late July to late September with both cover crop and weed aboveground biomass being sampled prior to winterkill. Stability was assessed by evaluating the variability in cover crop biomass for each treatment across plots within each site. While increasing cover crop mixture diversity was associated with increased average aboveground biomass, we assert that this was the result of the average biomass of the pure stands being drawn down by low biomass species rather than due to niche complementarity or increased resource use efficiency. At no site did the highest biomass mixture produce more than the highest biomass pure stand. Furthermore, while increases in cover crop mixture diversity were correlated with increases in weed suppression and biomass stability, we argue that this was largely the result of diversity co-varying with aboveground biomass, and that differences in aboveground biomass rather than differences in diversity drove the differences observed in weed suppression and stability.