Strategic switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) production within row cropping systems: Regional-scale assessment of soil erosion loss and water runoff impacts

Authors

Enheng Wang, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin
R. M. Cruse, Iowa State UniversityFollow
Bharat Sharma-Acharya, State of Oklahoma
Daryl E. Herzmann, Iowa State UniversityFollow
Brian K. Gelder, Iowa State UniversityFollow
David E. James, USDA-ARS National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment
Dennis C. Flanagan, USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research LaboratoryFollow
Humberto Blanco-Canqui, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Robert B. Mitchell, USDA-ARS Wheat, Sorghum and Forage Research UnitFollow
David Laird, Iowa State UniversityFollow

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2020

Citation

GCB Bioenergy. 2020;12:955–967. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/gcbb

DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12749

Comments

2020 The Authors.

Abstract

A strong need exists for tools to assess the efficacy of conservation practices across large regions supporting informed policy decisions that may lead to better soil and water conservation while optimizing agricultural production options. Perennial warm-season grasses (WSGs) such as switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), can be grown on marginally productive and/or environmentally sensitive lands to meet growing bioenergy demands while reducing water runoff and soil erosion compared to current row crop systems. Quantifying the soil and water conservation effects of WSG when strategically placed on the landscape would help support decisions favoring both economic and environmental benefits. We used the Daily Erosion Project (DEP) to simulate the effects of WSGs on hillslope water runoff and soil loss for 2008–2016 across eight major land resource areas (MLRA) in the Midwest United States. Four different scenarios (baseline or existing conditions and switchgrass grown on slopes ≥3%, ≥6%, and ≥10%) were modeled. Across all hillslope groups replacing row crops with switchgrass reduced yearly water runoff and soil loss by 3.2%–12.1% and 43.7%–95.5% compared with the baseline levels, respectively. Water and soil conservation efficiency (water runoff reductions or soil loss reductions associated with 1% increase in switchgrass coverage) increased with slope as 10% > 6% > 3% for all MLRAs. Switchgrass replacement on slopes ≥10% reduced average soil loss estimates as much as 22.6 Mg ha−1 year−1 for the most erosive MLRA (baseline soil erosion rate of 28.6 Mg ha−1 year−1) and resulted in all MLRA erosion estimates ≤6.0 Mg ha−1 year−1. For soil loss, an apparent interaction existed between slope group and total annual precipitation; as annual precipitation increased, the difference in soil loss between slope groups increased. Soil loss was more sensitive to these factors than was water runoff. Policy supporting a renewable energy industry while strategically improving soil and water resources seems globally advantageous.