American Judges Association

 

Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association

Accessibility Remediation

If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.

Authors

    Date of this Version

    May 2003

    Document Type

    Article

    Comments

    Published in Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, 40:1 (2003), pp. 2. Copyright © 2003 National Center for State Courts. Used by permission. Online at http://aja.ncsc.dni.us/htdocs/publications.htm.

    Abstract

    The lead article in this issue gives you a chance to test your beliefs about what leads to accurate—or to mistaken—eyewitness testimony. For 14 separate propositions on which research has given relatively clear answers, researchers Richard Wise and Martin Safer summarize the conclusions of researchers in the field. They also report the results of a survey of judges that tested judicial knowledge in these 14 areas, plus a few others. Thus, a review of this article will let you compare your knowledge both to other judges and to the best research available today.

    Included in

    Jurisprudence Commons

    Share

    COinS