American Judges Association

 

Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association

Accessibility Remediation

If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.

Authors

    Date of this Version

    2016

    Document Type

    Article

    Citation

    Court Review, Volume 52, Issue 2 (2016)

    Comments

    Copyright American Judges Association. Used by permission.

    Abstract

    In this issue, we present three articles squarely focused on what judges do, addressing issues of emotion, wisdom, and ethics.

    In our first article, Sharyn Roach Anleu, David Rottman, and Kathy Mack consider the role of emotion in the work judges do. They have embarked on a four-year international study of judging and emotions; this article provides a first look at background research, their project, and the intersection of emotions and judicial misbehavior as shown in several specific examples. For another look at judging and emotion, take a look at Terry Maroney’s prior Court Review article, The Emotionally Intelligent Judge: A New (And Realistic) Ideal, available online at http://goo.gl/SL96i0.

    Share

    COinS