American Judges Association
Court Review: Journal of the American Judges Association
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
Date of this Version
2020
Document Type
Article
Citation
Court Review - Volume 56
Abstract
The Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, requires a Canadian judge to provide “reasons” for any sentence imposed (see section 762.2). The Criminal Code does not require that reasons be provided for conviction or acquittal, but the Supreme Court of Canada has created a common-law requirement that reasons be provided when such decisions are rendered (see R. v. Sheppard, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869). In R. v. M.(R.E.), [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3, the Supreme Court indicated that the “basis for [a] trial judge’s verdict must be ‘intelligible,’ or capable of being made out. In other words, a logical connection between the verdict and the basis for the verdict must be apparent” (at paragraph 43).
Comments
Used by permission.