Three Year Summary: Comparison of Diets Collected from Esophageally Fistulated Cows to Forage Quality Estimated from Fecal Analysis

Authors

Bethany M. Johnston, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Jay D. Jenkins, University of Nebraska - LincolnFollow
Jacki A. Musgrave Musgrave, University of Nebraska–LincolnFollow
J. Travis Mulliniks, University of Nebraska - LincolnFollow
Mitchell B. Stephenson, University of Nebraska - LincolnFollow
James C. MacDonald, University of Nebraska - LincolnFollow
L. Aaron Stalker, Brigham Young University IdahoFollow

Date of this Version

2019

Citation

2019 Nebraska Beef Cattle Report

Comments

Copyright © The Board Regents of the University of Nebraska.

Abstract

Inconsistency was found in forage quality (crude protein and energy) when esophageally fistulated diets were compared to Nutrition Balance Analyzer (NUTBAL) analysis of fecal samples. On upland range sites, hand-clipping of samples (not a recommended practice to measure forage quality), was closer to fistulated diets than NUTBAL analysis. If cattle managers are solely utilizing NUTBAL for estimates of forage value, incorrect supplemental energy and protein decisions will likely be made resulting in the purchase of unnecessary supplements, thereby reducing the profitability of the operation.