(Mis)Communicating with Geographic Information System Mapping: Part 1--Choosing Units of Representation

Authors

Rodrigo Cantarero, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Maria deGuzman, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Sarah Taylor, California State University, Long BeachFollow
Soo-Young Hong, University of Nebraska - LincolnFollow
Jeong-Kyun Choi, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow

Date of this Version

4-2019

Citation

Cantarero, R., de Guzman, M. R. T., Taylor, S., Choi, J-K. & Hong, S-H. (2018). (Mis)Communicating with Geographic Information System Mapping: Part 1--Choosing Units of Representation. Journal of Extension, 57 (2).

Comments

©2019 Extension Journal Inc.

Abstract

Extension professionals are increasingly using geographic information system (GIS) technology to develop and inform programs and services. In this article, we use a mapping exercise to demonstrate how the unit of data can be applied and inadvertently misrepresented in GIS mapping. We contrast the use of counts, percentages, and location quotients with the same data and the resulting divergence in maps. The discussion addresses ideal circumstances for using each unit of data. Overall, the article illustrates the need for Extension professionals to be cognizant of the benefits and limitations of various units of data to avoid miscommunication when using GIS mapping.