Moisture insensitive prediction of soil properties from VNIR reflectance spectra based on external parameter orthogonalization

Authors

Nuwan K. Wijewardane, University of Nebraska - LincolnFollow
Yufeng Ge, University of Nebraska - LincolnFollow
Cristine L.S. Morgan, Texas A&M University

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2016

Citation

Geoderma 267 (2016) 92–101

Comments

© 2015 The Authors.

Abstract

Moisture is the single most important factor that affects soil reflectance spectra, particularly for field applications. Interest in using soil VNIR spectral libraries, which are commonly based on dry ground soils, to predict soils in the intact field-moist condition (in situ VNIR) is growing. External parameter orthogonalization (EPO) has been proposed as a useful method that links dry ground VNIR models to field moist scans. The goal of this study is to test EPO on a wider set of soil properties and four different modeling techniques, namely, Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). We selected and scanned 352 archived soil samples fromNebraska, USA, among which 185 samples were used to develop dry groundmodels and the remaining 167 sampleswere rewetted to eight differentmoisture levels for EPO development and testing. Two methods to determine optimum number of EPO components, model-coupled cross validation (Model-Coupled-CV) and Wilk's Λ were also compared. The results showed that EPO minimized the variability of soil spectra induced by moisture. Results suggest a preference for the Wilk's Λ method over Model-Coupled-CV for determining the number of EPO components g, as it produced smoother transformed spectra and more parsimonious models. Among the eight soil properties tested, EPO caused significant improvements for soil Organic Carbon (OC), Inorganic Carbon (IC), and Total Carbon (TC) prediction, marginal improvement for sand and clay, and no improvement for pH, Mehlich-3 Phosphorus, and Cation Exchange Capacity. The failed EPO for the latter three properties is attributable to the poor initial dry-ground models that EPO was built upon. For OC, IC, and TC, EPO coupled effectively with all four modeling methods, with ANN and SVM outperforming the other two slightly. This adds flexibility to the implementation of EPO in predicting field moist soils. As there are increasing demands of spatially-explicit soil data in many disciplines, EPO would be an important essential part for the future in situ VNIR based proximal soil sensing technology.