Agricultural and Biological Systems Engineering, Department of
Department of Agricultural and Biological Systems Engineering: Faculty Publications
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
2-16-2019
Citation
Feb. 16, 2019, unpublished manuscript
Abstract
Anthropogenic climate change will cause violence to increase globally, and nonlinear increases in sea level could cause a major escalation in global conflict. After 2100, a 22-meter sea-level rise is estimated here to dislocate two billion people from coastal areas. These impending civilization-changing events require us to again reevaluate our prevalent aesthetic preferences for luxury that produce a significant fraction of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Due to industrial inertia, a central dilemma discussed here is the contradictions between the goals and impacts of aesthetics and ethics. Either we lose our own well-being (a loss of high-emission aesthetics) for the benefit of others, or we further our own self-fulfillment via high-emission aesthetics at the expense of negligent climate-harm to others. In either scenario someone losses. Although most ethicists would identify the second scenario as inadequate, there may be good reason to also see the first scenario as a significant moral loss.
Included in
Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons, Environmental Engineering Commons, Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons
Comments
Copyright © 2019 Adam Liska