Can helmet design reduce the risk of concussion in football?

Authors

Steven Rowson, Virginia Tech–Wake Forest Center for Injury Biomechanics
Stefan M. Duma, Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University
Richard M. Greenwald, Dartmouth College
Jonathan Beckwith, Simbex LLC, Lebanon, NH
Jeffrey J. Chu, Simbex, Lebanon, New Hampshire
Kevin M. Guskiewicz, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jason P. Mihalik, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Joe Crisco, Brown UniversityFollow
Bethany J. Wilcox, Brown University
Thomas W. McAllister, Indiana University School of Medicine
Arthur C. Maerlender, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Steven P. Broglio, University of Michigan
Brock Schnebel, University of Oklahoma
Scott Anderson, University of Oklahoma
P. Gunnar Brolinson, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2014

Citation

Published in Journal of Neurosurgery 120 (April 2014), pp 919–922. doi 10.3171/2014.1.JNS13916

Comments

Copyright © 2014 American Association of Neurological Surgeons.

Abstract

Of all sports, football accounts for the highest incidence of concussion in the US due to the large number of athletes participating and the nature of the sport. While there is general agreement that concussion incidence can be reduced through rule changes and teaching proper tackling technique, there remains debate as to whether helmet design may also reduce the incidence of concussion. A retrospective analysis was performed of head impact data collected from 1833 collegiate football players who were instrumented with helmet-mounted accelerometer arrays for games and practices. Data were collected between 2005 and 2010 from 8 collegiate football teams: Virginia Tech, University of North Carolina, University of Oklahoma, Dartmouth College, Brown University, University of Minnesota, Indiana University, and University of Illinois. Concussion rates were compared between players wearing Riddell VSR4 and Riddell Revolution helmets while controlling for the head impact exposure of each player. A total of 1,281,444 head impacts were recorded, from which 64 concussions were diagnosed. The relative risk of sustaining a concussion in a Revolution helmet compared with a VSR4 helmet was 46.1% (95% CI 28.1%–75.8%). When controlling for each player’s exposure to head impact, a significant difference was found between concussion rates for players in VSR4 and Revolution helmets (χ² = 4.68, p = 0.0305). This study illustrates that differences in the ability to reduce concussion risk exist between helmet models in football. Although helmet design may never prevent all concussions from occurring in football, evidence illustrates that it can reduce the incidence of this injury.