Absorptive Capacity in Rural Schools: Bending Not Breaking During Disruptive Innovation Implementation

Authors

Sarah J. Zuckerman, University of Nebraska - LincolnFollow
Kristen Campbell Wilcox, University at Albany, SUNYFollow
Kathryn S. Schiller, University at Albany, SUNYFollow
Francesca T. Durand, The Sage CollegesFollow

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2018

Citation

Journal of Research in Rural Education, 2018, 34(3), pp 1-27.

https://jrre.psu.edu/

Comments

Published by Center on Rural Education and Communities, College of Education, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802. ISSN 1551-0670

Abstract

Rural schools have repeatedly been subjected to standardizing state and federal education policies that seek to minimize variance in instructional systems and increase the number of college- and career-ready graduates. The Race to the Top policy agenda combined standards-based and accountability-based reforms to meet these objectives and once again subjected rural schools to innovations from outside experts. This qualitative study uses four instrumental cases of rural schools to understand: 1) leadership strategies, and 2) mechanisms and processes of alignment, which allowed schools to maintain high levels of student performance in the face of disruptive policy innovations. The fi ndings of the cross-case analysis identify rural school and district leaders’ contingent use of adaptive strategies of buff ering, bridging, and brokering. Mechanisms and processes of shared goal setting, ongoing curriculum revision, and teacher collaboration that contribute to the development of coherence supported these strategies. Together, leadership strategies and coherence allow leaders and educators to assimilate, transform, and create new knowledge in ways that provide absorptive capacity and allow for selective implementation of disruptive innovations.