Communication Studies, Department of
Department of Communication Studies: Faculty Publications
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
10-2013
Citation
Published in Women’s Studies in Communication 36:3 (2013), pages 267–287; doi: 10.1080/07491409.2013.829791
Abstract
This essay examines the rhetoric of choice as it is used by direct-to-consumer campaigns to persuade women to limit menstruation through the consumption of oral contraceptives. Using the tools of feminist rhetorical criticism, I trace how choice is rhetorically constructed to suggest that menstrual suppression is a path to individual empowerment while co-opting second and post-second-wave rhetorics. Finally, I explore the meaning of these constructions of choice and suggest broader implications for ongoing feminist movements.
Comments
Copyright © 2013 The Organization for Research on Women and Communication. Published by Taylor & Francis. Used by permission.