Off-campus UNL users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your NU ID and password. When you are done browsing please remember to return to this page and log out.
Non-UNL users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.
Matters of Argument: Materiality, Listening, and Practices of Openness in First-Year Writing Classes
Abstract
This dissertation argues for the value of increased focus on practices of listening in rhetorical education, especially in first-year writing courses. Building on research in listening rhetorics, new materialism, and contemplative pedagogy, the author presents a pedagogical and rhetorical vision for more open argument. Open arguments function with open-heartedness, an open-ethos, openness to listening to Others and the material world, openness to a multiplicity of viewpoints, open-endedness, and openness to productive conflict. The author argues that students can learn to write these more open arguments through a combination of listening to the material world around them, listening to their own bodies, and listening to their interlocutors. These listening practices are explored through a pedagogical self-study that shows how listening to the material world can help writers move beyond the constraints of the thesis-support model into open-ended complexity; explore new materially based metaphors to write less combative deliberative arguments; and use greater awareness of one’s embodied reactions and positionality to listen to and dialogue with others across difference.
Subject Area
Rhetoric and Composition|Language arts|Pedagogy
Recommended Citation
Houston, Mark Andrew, "Matters of Argument: Materiality, Listening, and Practices of Openness in First-Year Writing Classes" (2023). ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. AAI30572206.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI30572206