Off-campus UNL users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your NU ID and password. When you are done browsing please remember to return to this page and log out.

Non-UNL users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.

TRADITIONAL METHOD VERSUS COMPUTER-AIDED INSTRUCTION IN TEACHING KEYBOARDING SKILLS TO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL-AGE CHILDREN

TIMOTHY EARL ANDERSON, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a significant difference between computer-aided instruction and the traditional approach to teaching keyboarding skills to third- and fourth-grade students. The objectives of the study were (a) to determine if students of this age level have the necessary kinesthetic responses to learn touch typing or keyboarding skills; (b) to determine if students of this age level can learn keyboarding skills independently through the use of computer software; (c) to determine whether or not the software package used in this study was adequate for this age level; (d) to determine what level of speed can be reasonably expected of this age level student; and (e) to determine, based on a child's reading ability, if one method was more appropriate than the other. Twenty-four participants were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups in four separate, half-hour time slots. Each group met three days a week for a four-week period of time. All participants used the Model III TRS-80 microcomputer keyboard. Treatment groups C used the Alphabetic Keyboarding software for learning the alphabetic keys, while treatment groups T used the text, Basic Information Keyboarding Skills and Scripsit. A pretest-midtest-posttest design was used, along with a questionnaire to evaluate the effectiveness of the study. The t-test of significant means revealed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in posttest scores or posttest errors. Results revealed the following about the objectives: (a) both groups increased significantly from pretest to posttest with a median score of 6 GWAM; (b) C group increased significantly, with a median score of 6 GWAM; (c) the software package needed revisions for use; (d) students GWAM ranged from 4 to 16, with a median of 6 GWAM; and (e) a preferred method was inconclusive.

Subject Area

Business education

Recommended Citation

ANDERSON, TIMOTHY EARL, "TRADITIONAL METHOD VERSUS COMPUTER-AIDED INSTRUCTION IN TEACHING KEYBOARDING SKILLS TO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL-AGE CHILDREN" (1983). ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. AAI8412292.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI8412292

Share

COinS