Off-campus UNL users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your NU ID and password. When you are done browsing please remember to return to this page and log out.

Non-UNL users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.

Breath management terminology in American vocal pedagogy: A comparison of contemporary terminology with sources, 1900-1910

Donald Callen Freed, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Abstract

The purpose was to compare definitions and descriptions of primary terms for teaching breathing in textbooks of two periods. A review of literature suggested: (a) controversy in approaches and terms used to teach breathing; (b) differences in breathing terminology; (c) standardization of terminology is important for some but not others; (d) researchers seek clarification; and (e) terminology affects vocal production. Thirty-five texts from 1900-1910 and 23 texts from 1970-1990 were analyzed using a historical/qualitative approach, comparing terms and definitions. Control was the major term 1900-1910, involving one, two, or three muscle groups; muscular balance was an important concept. Effort included freedom vs. rigidity and efficiency vs. capacity. For some, nature must be trained; for others, nature should be obeyed. Automatic control was equated with artistic singing. Other primary terms included: (a) breath support, (b) breath management, (c) vocalized breath, (d) natural breathing, (e) appoggio, (f) inspiration-expiration, and (g) respiration. Some pedagogues had no central term, and one was anti-control. There was variance in contemporary terms, yet agreement about concepts. Support/control concurrently were primary terms. Support/control involved two, three, or four muscle groups; balance was also important, although concepts were different, as with effort. Nature should be trained; automatic control indicated artistic singing. Other primary terms included: (a) support, (b) control (separately), (c) support/control/management, (d) management (separately), (e) pressure, (f) appoggio, and (g) energy. One pedagogue had no central term; one was anti-control and anti-terminology. Terms from both periods are compared with Reid's (1983) A Dictionary of Vocal Terminology. Appoggio is suggested for teaching, as are learning style and student inventories. Future research suggests historical/comparative and qualitative studio studies.

Subject Area

Music education|Music

Recommended Citation

Freed, Donald Callen, "Breath management terminology in American vocal pedagogy: A comparison of contemporary terminology with sources, 1900-1910" (1991). ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. AAI9133290.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI9133290

Share

COinS