Off-campus UNL users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your NU ID and password. When you are done browsing please remember to return to this page and log out.
Non-UNL users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.
An investigation of teachers' knowledge about students with learning disabilities in Jordan and their teaching strategies during mathematics instruction
Abstract
The purpose for conducting this study was to investigate Jordanian mathematics teachers' knowledge of learning disabilities and what strategies they used to teach students with suspected learning disabilities. Both teacher's knowledge and their strategies during mathematics instruction were examined by use of a survey instrument. A stratified random sample was used to select 426 mathematics teachers in Jordan. The total number of schools included in this study was 309 (148 boys' schools and 161 girls' schools). All mathematics teachers (426) who taught in grades 5, 6, 7, and 8 in selected schools were asked to participate in the study. A total of 417 surveys were returned, for a return rate of 97.8 percent. Of the 417 mathematics teachers who responded to the survey, 51 (12.2%) identified the student as having a suspected learning disability, based on the information provided in the case study. As a whole, respondents thought the workshops held by the Ministry of Education were the professional experiences that contributed most to teachers' knowledge of how to instruct students with severe problems in mathematics. The results of a MANOVA analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups of respondents (those who did and those who did not identify the student as having a suspected leaming disability) for the five dependent variables (behavioral, direct instruction, cognitive, alternative, and individualized instruction strategies) ($p\ >\ .05$, multivariate F =.723). The Wilks test value was.986. Teachers who identified the student as having a suspected learning disability in mathematics rated reinforcing correct answers as the most important strategy for teaching mathematics. Fourteen of the 15 mathematics strategies had means ranging between "some" and "great" in importance. The least-valued strategy was using computer-assisted instruction. The chi-square analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between the two variables (teachers' gender and students' gender) (chi-square = 1.303, $p\ >\ .05$). Results of a stepwise regression indicated that none of the independent variables (teachers' gender, years of experience, professional training, and class size) explained the variance in the teachers' ability to identify students with learning disabilities in mathematics.
Subject Area
Mathematics education|Special education|School administration
Recommended Citation
Al-Natour, Mayada M, "An investigation of teachers' knowledge about students with learning disabilities in Jordan and their teaching strategies during mathematics instruction" (1997). ETD collection for University of Nebraska-Lincoln. AAI9725105.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI9725105