Documentary Editing, Association for

 

Date of this Version

1981

Document Type

Article

Citation

Newsletter of the Association for Documentary Editing, Volume 3, Number 2, May 1981. ISSN 0196-7134

Comments

© Association for Documentary Editing, 1981. Used by permission.

Abstract

It is in these two problem areas, lack of material and ethnocentric bias, that the historical editor can best offer help to the ethnohistorian. The importance of any single early colonial document containing description of preliterate peoples in North America is almost incalculable. In some few instances our knowledge of the very existence of individual tribes rests upon such a single document. 5 For this reason the historical editor should consider the needs of ethnohistory when he is choosing documents to edit for publication. The modern growth of interest in social history has broken the hold of the "Great White Men" bias in historical editing, and Native Americans are among those groups which have suffered from this kind of neglect in the past. But just as is the case with documentary materials which give us more information about the lives of women, blacks, and the poor, ethnohistorical materials make a solid contribution to a more complete history, and this reason alone offers adequate justification for paying special attention to them.