Child, Youth, and Family Studies, Department of

 

Date of this Version

2-22-2022

Citation

Published in Reading and Writing 2022

doi:10.1007/s11145-022-10254-w

Comments

Copyright © 2022 Rachel E. Schachter; published by Springer Nature B.V. Used by permission.

Abstract

This study utilized a novel phenomenological approach with a stimulated recall procedure to understand the pedagogical reasoning of eight early child teachers during the enactment of literacy instruction in whole-group meeting and language arts activities. This approach to investigating knowledge—in contrast to more tra­ditional conceptualizations of knowledge—focused on knowledge use as a process and prioritized teachers’ perspectives on knowledge used to enact literacy instruc­tion in their own classrooms. Additionally, it allowed for a more nuanced investi­gation of the role of setting and teacher characteristics that are often examined in association with literacy instruction (e.g., degree attainment, years of experience, curriculum, instructional activity). Six types of knowledge were used by teachers in their pedagogical reasoning. In order of frequency of use these were knowledge of: goals for instruction, children, feelings, school environment, developing skills, and past experiences. Importantly, teachers made more references to knowledge derived from their immediate contexts as compared to decontextualized knowledge. Impli­cations for understanding connections between knowledge and literacy instruction are discussed.

Share

COinS