Reply to the discussion and comments of Azerêdo et al. (2023) and Schneider et al. (2023) on the paper by Magalhães et al. ‘Middle Jurassic multi-scale transgressive–regressive cycles: An example from the Lusitanian Basin’, The Depositional Record, 9, 174–202

Authors

Antonio J.C. Magalhães, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de LisboaFollow
Gerson J.S. Terra, Terra Carbonates
Felipe Guadagnin, Universidade Federal do Pampa
Daniel G.C. Fragoso, Petrobras
Mirian C. Menegazzo, Petrobras
Nuno L.A. Pimentel, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa
Sissa Kumaira, Universidade Federal do Pampa
Gerson Fauth, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
Alessandra Santos, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
David K. Watkins, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Mauro D.R. Bruno, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
Daiane Ceolin, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
Simone Baecker-Fauth, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
Guilherme P.R. Gabaglia, Petrobras
Washington L.E. Teixeira, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Francisco P. Lima-Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Date of this Version

1-1-2023

Citation

Depositional Rec. 2023;00:1–7.

DOI: 10.1002/dep2.254

Comments

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,

© 2023 The Authors. The Depositional Record published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association of Sedimentologists.

Abstract

cently published paper. The exchange of ideas, data and interpretation improves our knowledge and is the right way to discuss science's advances. This reply considers the points raised by Azerêdo et al. (2023) and Schneider et al. (2023). In both manuscripts, these authors raised many issues about sedimentological and stratigraphic aspects that can be separated into two groups: (a) those related to the age of the studied succession; and (b) those assigning the studied succession to the Candeeiros Formation.