Corrigendum to “Testing pyroxenite versus peridotite sources for marine basalts using U-series isotopes” [Lithos 332–333 (2019) 226–244]

Authors

Lynne J. Elkins, University of Nebraska-LincolnFollow
Bernard Bourdon, Université de Lyon
Sarah Lambart, University of Utah

Date of this Version

5-25-2023

Citation

LITHOS 452–453 (2023) 107217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2023.107217

Comments

Used by permission.

Abstract

The authors regret that a small error in the dynamic melting Matlab script used for this paper produced erroneous results for some of the included modeling outcomes. We have written an updated modeling program in python, which can be accessed in the ENKI and pyUserCalc public data repository (https://gitlab.com/ENKI-portal/pyUsercalc/). Although the corrected results shown in revised versions of Figs. S3, S4, S8, S9, and S10 now appear quite different from the original publication, however, we find that when restricted to plausible scenarios of interest, our conclusions overall have not significantly changed. Some details of our results and discussion require corrections, however.