Center, Internet, Wildlife Damage Management
Human–Wildlife Interactions
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
Positive Bias in Bird Strikes to Engines on Left Side of Aircraft
Date of this Version
Spring 2017
Document Type
Article
Citation
Human–Wildlife Interactions (Spring 2017) 11(1): article 7
doi: 10.26077/hp2d-c437
Abstract
Previous studies have indicated more birds collide with communication towers equipped with red warning lights than with towers equipped with lights of shorter wavelengths. We used the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration’s National Wildlife Strike Database to determine if a similar relationship exists for turbine-powered jet aircraft with 2 underwing- or fuselage-mounted engines and bird strikes. We compared bird strikes reported to engine #1 (left side = red lighting) or to engine #2 (right side = green lighting) using chi-square tests (α = 0.05). For both underwing- and fuselage-mounted engines, more (P ≤ 0.04) strikes were reported for engine #1 compared to engine #2 during Day, Night, and Dawn/Dusk flights. These findings suggest that modifying red navigation lights to include shorter wavelengths and the use of supplemental lights specifically designed for avian vision could enhance detection and reduce bird strikes.
Comments
United States government work. Public domain