Center, Internet, Wildlife Damage Management
Human–Wildlife Interactions
Accessibility Remediation
If you are unable to use this item in its current form due to accessibility barriers, you may request remediation through our remediation request form.
Rebuttals, Retractions, and the Peer-Review Process: Clarifying HWI Policies
Date of this Version
Winter 2020
Document Type
Article
Citation
Human–Wildlife Interactions (Winter 2020) 14(3): article 24
doi: 10.26077/2e60-64ea
Special topic: Bird damage
Abstract
In this Back Page article, Human-Wildlife Interactions Editor-in-Chief Terry Messmer addresses the journal's peer-review process as well as an ethical approach to rebuttals, commentaries, and retractions of published work. This level of transparency is essential to ensure scientific rigor in scholarly publishing.
COinS
Comments
Open access. License: CC BY 4.0