A comparison of bats and rodents as reservoirs of zoonotic viruses: are bats special?

Authors

Angela D. Luis, Colorado State University
David T. S. Hayman, Colorado State UniversityFollow
Thomas J. O'Shea, US Geological Survey
Paul M. Cryan, US Geological SurveyFollow
Amy T. Gilbert, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious DiseasesFollow
Juliet R. C. Pulliam, University of Florida
James N. Mills, Emory University
Mary E. Timonin, University of Winnipeg
Craig K. R. Willis, University of Winnipeg
Andrew A. Cunningham, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of LondonFollow
Anthony R. Fooks, National Consortium for Zoonosis Research
Charles E. Rupprecht, The Global Alliance for Rabies Control
James L. N. Wood, University of Cambridge
Colleen T. Webb, Colorado State UniversityFollow

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2013

Citation

Luis, A.D., D.T.S. Hayman, T.J O’Shea, P.M. Cryan, A.T. Gilbert, J.R.C. Pulliam, J.N. Mills, M.E.Timonin, C.K.R. Willis, A.A. Cunningham, A.R. Fooks, C.E. Rupprecht, J.L.N. Wood, and C.T. Webb. 2013. A comparison of bats and rodents as reservoirs of zoonotic viruses: Are bats special? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B. Biological Sciences 280: 20122753. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2753

Comments

U.S. government work.

Abstract

Bats are the natural reservoirs of a number of high-impact viral zoonoses. We present a quantitative analysis to address the hypothesis that bats are unique in their propensity to host zoonotic viruses based on a comparisonwith rodents, another important host order. We found that bats indeed host more zoonotic viruses per species than rodents, and we identified life-history and ecological factors that promote zoonotic viral richness. More zoonotic viruses are hosted by species whose distributions overlap with a greater number of other species in the same taxonomic order (sympatry). Specifically in bats, therewas evidence for increased zoonotic viral richness in species with smaller litters (one young), greater longevity and more litters per year. Furthermore, our results point to a new hypothesis to explain in part why bats host more zoonotic viruses per species: the stronger effect of sympatry in bats andmore viruses shared between bat species suggests that interspecific transmission is more prevalent among bats than among rodents.Although bats hostmore zoonotic viruses per species, the total number of zoonotic viruses identified in bats (61) was lower than in rodents (68), a result of there being approximately twice the number of rodent species as bat species. Therefore, rodents should still be a serious concern as reservoirs of emerging viruses. These findings shed light on disease emergence and perpetuation mechanisms and may help lead to a predictive framework for identifying future emerging infectious virus reservoirs.