Assessing the Efficiency of Local Rabies Vaccination Strategies for Raccoons (Procyon lotor) in an Urban Setting

Authors

Guillaume Bastille-Rousseau, Southern Illinois University CarbondaleFollow
Nicole T. Gorman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Katherine M. McClure, USDA APHIS WS NWRC Colorado
Larissa Nituch, Trent University
Tore Buchanan, Trent University
Richard B. Chipman, USDA APHIS WS NRMP New HampshireFollow
Amy T. Gilbert, USDA APHIS WS NWRC ColoradoFollow
Kim M. Pepin, USDA APHIS WS NWRC ColoradoFollow

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2024

Citation

Journal of Wildlife Diseases (2024) 60(1): 26–38

doi: 10.7589/JWD-D-23-00059

Comments

United States government work

Abstract

Raccoon rabies virus (RRV) has been managed using multiple vaccination strategies, including oral rabies vaccination and trap-vaccinate-release (TVR). Identifying a rabies vaccination strategy for an area is a nontrivial task. Vaccination strategies differ in the amount of effort and monetary costs required to achieve a particular level of vaccine seroprevalence (efficiency). Simulating host movement relative to different vaccination strategies in silico can provide a useful tool for exploring the efficiency of different vaccination strategies. We refined a previously developed individual-based model of raccoon movement to evaluate vaccination strategies for urban Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. We combined different oral rabies vaccination baiting (hand baiting, helicopter, and bait stations) with TVR strategies and used GPS data to parameterize and simulate raccoon movement in Hamilton. We developed a total of 560 vaccination strategies, in consultation with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, for RRV control in Hamilton. We documented the monetary costs of each vaccination strategy and estimated the population seroprevalence. Intervention costs and seroprevalence estimates were used to calculate the efficiency of each strategy to meet targets set for the purpose of RRV control. Estimated seroprevalence across different strategies varied widely, ranging from less than 5% to more than 70%. Increasing bait densities (distributed using by hand or helicopter) led to negligible increase in seroprevalence. Helicopter baiting was the most efficient and TVR was the least efficient, but helicopter-based strategies led to lower levels of seroprevalence (6–12%) than did TVR-based strategies (17–70%). Our simulations indicated that a mixed strategy including at least some TVR may be the most efficient strategy for a local urban RRV control program when seroprevalence levels .30% may be required. Our simulations provide information regarding the efficiency of different vaccination strategies for raccoon populations, to guide local RRV control in urban settings.