Evaluation of Contingency Actions to Control the Spread of Raccoon Rabies in Ohio and Virginia

Authors

Amy J. Davis, USDA APHIS WS NWRC Fort CollinsFollow
Richard B. Chipman, USDA APHIS WS NRMP Concord
Kathleen M. Nelson, USDA APHIS WS NRMP Concord
Betsy S. Haley, USDA APHIS WS NRMP Concord
Jordana D. Kirby, USDA APHIS WS NRMP Concord
Xiaoyue Ma, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Ryan M. Wallace, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Amy. T. Gilbert, USDA APHIS WS NWRC Fort Collins

Document Type

Article

Date of this Version

2024

Citation

Preventive Veterinary Medicine (2024) 225: 106145

doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106145

Abstract

The raccoon (Procyon lotor) variant of the rabies virus (RRV) is enzootic in the eastern United States and oral rabies vaccination (ORV) is the primary strategy to prevent and control landscape spread. Breaches of ORV management zones occasionally occur, and emergency “contingency” actions may be implemented to enhance local control. Contingency actions are an integral part of landscape-scale wildlife rabies management but can be very costly and routinely involve enhanced rabies surveillance (ERS) around the index case. We investigated two contingency actions in Ohio (2017–2019 and 2018–2021) and one in Virginia (2017–2019) using a dynamic, multi-method occupancy approach to examine relationships between specific management actions and RRV occurrence, including whether ERS was sufficient around the index case. The RRV occupancy was assessed seasonally at 100-km² grids and we examined relationships across three spatial scales (regional management zone, RRV free regions, and local contingency areas). The location of a grid relative to the ORV management zone was the strongest predictor of RRV occupancy at the regional scale. In RRV free regions, the neighbor effect and temporal variability were most important in influencing RRV occupancy. Parenteral (hand) vaccination of raccoons was important across all three contingency action areas, but more influential in the Ohio contingency action areas where more raccoons were hand vaccinated. In the Virginia contingency action area, ORV strategies were as important in reducing RRV occupancy as a hand vaccination strategy. The management action to trap, euthanize, and test (TET) raccoons was an important method to increase ERS, yet the impacts of TET on RRV occupancy are not clear. The probability of detecting additional cases of RRV was exceptionally high (> 0.95) during the season the index case occurred. The probability of detecting RRV through ERS declined in the seasons following initial TET efforts but remained higher after the contingency action compared to the ERS detection probabilities prior to index case incidence. Local RRV cases were contained within one year and eliminated within 2–3 years of each contingency action.