U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
United States Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services: Staff Publications
Document Type
Article
Date of this Version
12-2023
Citation
Southwestern Naturalist (December 2023) 67(4): 255–262
Associate editor, Troy Ladine
Additional metadata associated with this study are available at https://doi.org/10.5066/P9WEJZ2X (Lorch et al., 2023).
Abstract
Abstract
The validity of Myotis occultus as a species unique from Myotis lucifugus has been a source of debate. Most recently, many authorities treat M. occultus as a distinct species, at least in part because a previous study showed that M. occultus and M. l. carissima (the subspecies that occurs in closest geographic proximity to M. occultus) form separate monophyletic clades based on sequences of two mitochondrial genes (cytochrome-b [cytb] and cytochrome oxidase subunit II [COII]). We re-evaluated the phylogenetic relationship between M. occultus and M. lucifugus based on mitochondrial sequences using an expanded dataset of cytb and COII sequences that originated from more genetically diverse specimens of M. lucifugus collected across a broader geographic area. Based on a phylogenetic analysis, we found that M. occultus sublineages embedded within a well-supported clade that included some specimens of M. lucifugus. These results indicate that the previous genetic analysis demonstrating that M. occultus and M. lucifugus form distinct monophyletic groups is unsupported by our larger dataset. Future research will likely need to focus on genetic work involving whole-genome sequencing of nuclear DNA to better resolve the true taxonomic relationship between M. occultus and M. lucifugus.
Resumen
La valides de Myotis occultus como una especie distinta a Myotis lucifugus ha sido fuente de debate. Recientemente, muchas autoridades han considerado M. occultus como una especie diferente, en parte porque un estudio anterior mostró que M. occultus y M. l. carissima (la subespecie con la mayor proximidad geográfica a M. occultus) forman clados monofiléticos separados basados en secuencias de dos genes mitocondriales (el citocromo-b [cytb] y la subunidad II de citocromo oxidasa [COII]). Nosotros hemos reevaluado la relación filogenética entre M. occultus y M. lucifugus usando una ampliada colección de datos que contiene secuencias de los genes mitocondriales cytb y COII de especímenes de M. lucifugus genéticamente más diversos que fueron muestreados en un área geográfica más extensa. Nuestro análisis filogenético muestra que los sublinajes de M. occultus están incrustados dentro de un clado bien respaldado que incluye algunos especímenes de M. lucifugus. Estos resultados indican que el análisis genético anterior que demostró que M. occultus y M. lucifugus forman grupos monofiléticos distintos no está respaldado por nuestra más amplia colección de datos. Es probable que para resolver mejor la verdadera relación taxonómica entre M. occultus y M. lucifugus sea necesario el uso de secuenciación del genoma completo del ADN nuclear.
Included in
Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Other Environmental Sciences Commons, Other Veterinary Medicine Commons, Population Biology Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, Veterinary Infectious Diseases Commons, Veterinary Microbiology and Immunobiology Commons, Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Epidemiology, and Public Health Commons, Zoology Commons
Comments
United States government work