Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

 

Date of this Version

Summer 5-20-2014

Document Type

Article

Citation

  1. Agarwal, R., and Lucas, H. C. Jr. (2005). The information systems identity crisis: Focusing on high visibility and high impact research. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 381-398.
  2. Barki, H., Rivard, S., and Talbot, J. (1993). A keyword classification scheme for IS research literature: An update. MIS Quarterly, 17(2), 209-226.
  3. Baskerville, R. L. and Myers, M. (2002). Information Systems as a Reference Discipline. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), pp 1-14.
  4. Benamati, J., Serva, M. A., Galletta, D.F., Harris, A., and Niederman, F. (2007). The slippery slope of MIS academia: A discussion of the quest for relevance in our discipline. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 18 (Article 32), 657-675.
  5. Benbasat, I., and Weber, R. (1996). Rethinking “diversity” in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 389-399.
  6. Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R. W. (1999). Empirical research in information systems: The practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 3-16.
  7. Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 183-194.
  8. Culnan, M. J. (1987). Mapping the Intellectual Structure of MIS, 1980 – 1985. A Co-citation Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), pp 341-353.
  9. Davenport, T. H., and Markus, M. L. (1999). Rigor vs. relevance revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 19-23.
  10. Dearden, J. (1972). MIS is a mirage. Harvard Business Review, 50(1), 90-99.
  11. Holsapple, C. W. (2008). The pulse of multi participant systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 18(4), 333-343.
  12. Ives, B., Hamilton, S., and Davis, G.B. (1980). A framework for research in computer-based management information systems. Management Science, 26(9), 910-934.
  13. Katerattanakul, P., Han, B., and Rea, A. (2006). Is information system a reference discipline?. Communications of the ACM, 49(5), 114-1148.
  14. Mahapatra, G. (2009). Bibliometrics Studies: In the Internet Era. Indiana Publishing House, New Delhi, 1-46.
  15. Mason, R.O., and Mitroff, I. I. (1973). A program for research on management information systems. Management Science, 19(5), 475-487.
  16. Morrisey, L. J. (2002). Bibliometric and bibliographic analysis in an era of electronic scholarly communication. Science & Technology Libraries, 22 (3/4), 149-160.
  17. Orlikowski, W. J., and Lacono, C. S. (2001). Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research­ – A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121-134.
  18. Palvia, P., Pinjani, P., and Sibley, E. H. (2007). A profile of information systems research published in Information and Management. Information and Management, 44(1), 1-11.
  19. Robey, D. (1996). Diversity in information systems research: Threat, Promise, and responsibility. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 400-408.
  20. Sahoo, J. and Mohanty, B. (2002). Studies in Conservation: A Bibliometrics Analysis. ILA Bulletin, 38 (3), 98-105.
  21. Sangam S. and Kumbar, B. D. (2009). Webmetrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics - Measuring Scientific and Technological Progress of India, National Seminar Papers and Proceedings, 21-22, December 2009, 1-239.
  22. Serenko, A., Bontis, N., and Grant, J. (2009). A scientometric analysis of the proceedings of the McMaster World Congress on the Management of Intellectual Capital and Innovation for the 1996-2008 period. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(1), 8-21.
  23. Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J.S., and Ramakrishnan, T. (2008). Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 467-482.
  24. Subramanian, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review; Journal of Information Science, 6 (1), 33-38.
  25. Tiew, W. S., Abdullah, A. and Kaur, K. (2002). Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 1996–2000: A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Sc., 6 (2), 43-56
  26. Verma. N. (2004). Analysis of Contributions of IASLIC Bulletin. IASLIC Bulletin, 49 (2), 93-103.

Abstract

The present study reveals the publication pattern of the articles published during the period 1995 – 2009 of “Management Information Systems Quarterly” (MISQ) Journal. The study also encompasses the scientometrics sketch not only of 596 research papers during the period of study but also the various journal parameters like SJR (SCImago Journal Rank), SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper), total number of citations received by the journal in the year as well as percentage not cited (i.e. % of documents published in a year that have never been cited to date) etc. from the SCOPOUS database. Further, it analyzes various other bibliometrics angles such as: growth of literature, authorship patterns, degree of collaboration, geographical distribution of publications, distribution of article types by journal, and ranking pattern etc.

Download

Share

COinS