Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

 

Date of this Version

2016

Document Type

Article

Citation

  1. Barki, H., Rivard, S., and Talbot, J. (1993). A keyword classification scheme for IS research literature: An update. MIS Quarterly, 17(2), 209-226.
  2. Baskerville, R. L. and Myers, M. (2002). Information Systems as a Reference Discipline. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), pp 1-14.
  3. Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 183-194.
  4. Cooper, R. B., D. Blair, & M. Pao (1993). Communicating MIS Research: A Citation Study of Journal Influence. Information Processing & Management, 29(1), 113-127.
  5. Cote, J. A., Leong, S. M., and Cote, J. (1991). Assessing the Influence of Journal of Consumer Research: A Citation Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 402-410.
  6. Culnan, M. J. (1987). Mapping the Intellectual Structure of MIS, 1980 – 1985. A Co-citation Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), pp 341-353.
  7. Davenport, T. H., and Markus, M. L. (1999). Rigor vs. relevance revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 19-23.
  8. Dearden, J. (1972). MIS is a mirage. Harvard Business Review, 50(1), 90-99.
  9. Frame, J. D. (1977). Mainstream Research in Latin America and Caribbean, Interciencia, 2, 143-148.
  10. Garcia, P., et al. (2005). Evolution of Spanish Scientific Production in International Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals during the period 1986-2002. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 123, 150-156.
  11. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities, New York, NY: Wiley
  12. Garg, K. C., & Padhi, P. (2001). A Study of Collaborations in Laser Science Technology, Scientometrics, 51, 415-427.
  13. Gorla, N., & Walker, G. (1998). Is the lack of keyword synergism inhibiting maturation in the MIS theory? An exploratory perspective. Information Processing & Management, 34 (2/3), 325-339.
  14. Holsapple, C. W. (2008). The pulse of multi participant systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 18(4), 333-343.
  15. Howard, G. S., & Day, J. D. (1995). Individual productivity and impact in developmental psychology, Developmental Review, 15 (2), 136-49.
  16. Howard, G. S., Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (1987). Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychology Association, American Psychologist, 42 (11), 975-86.
  17. Ives, B., Hamilton, S., and Davis, G.B. (1980). A framework for research in computer-based management information systems. Management Science, 26(9), 910-934.
  18. Jackson, D. N. & Rushton, P. (1987). Scientific Excellence: Origins and Assessment, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
  19. Katerattanakul, P., Han, B., and Rea, A. (2006). Is information system a reference discipline?. Communications of the ACM, 49(5), 114-1148.
  20. Kuhn, T. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago, 10.
  21. Leong, S. M. (1989). A Citation Analysis of the Journal of Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, (15) March, 492-497.
  22. Lotka, A. J. (1926). Frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academic Science, 16(12), 317-323.
  23. Mason, R.O., and Mitroff, I. I. (1973). A program for research on management information systems. Management Science, 19(5), 475-487.
  24. Miler, G. A., Newman, E. B. & Friedman, E. A. (1958). Length-frequency statistics for written English, 1, 370-389.
  25. Mohanty, B. (2014). Management Information Systems Quarterly (MISQ): A Bibliometric Study, Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), Paper 1119. (accessed on 24 November 2015) http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1119
  26. Morrisey, L. J. (2002). Bibliometric and bibliographic analysis in an era of electronic scholarly communication. Science & Technology Libraries, 22 (3/4), 149-160.
  27. Mylonopoulos, N., & Theoharakis, V. (2001). Global Perceptions of IS Journals. Communications of the ACM, 9(44), 29-33.
  28. Orlikowski, W. J., and Lacono, C. S. (2001). Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research­ – A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121-134.
  29. Palvia, P., Pinjani, P., and Sibley, E. H. (2007). A profile of information systems research published in Information and Management. Information and Management, 44(1), 1-11.
  30. Potter, W. G. (1981). Lotka’s Law revisited. Library Trends, 30, 21-29.
  31. Robey, D. (1996). Diversity in information systems research: Threat, Promise, and responsibility. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 400-408.
  32. Sahoo, J. and Mohanty, B. (2002). Studies in Conservation: A Bibliometrics Analysis. ILA Bulletin, 38 (3), 98-105.
  33. Salancik, G. R. (1986). An Index of Subgroup Influence in Dependency Networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2(31), 194-211.
  34. Schubert, A., & Barun T. (1986). Relative Indicators and Relational Charts for Comparative Assessment of Publication Output and Citation Impact, Scientometrics, 9, 281-291.
  35. Scott, L. C., & Mitias, P. M. (1996). Trends in rankings of economics departments in the US: an update, Economic Inquiry, 34 (2), 378-400.
  36. Serenko, A., Bontis, N., and Grant, J. (2009). A scientometric analysis of the proceedings of the McMaster World Congress on the Management of Intellectual Capital and Innovation for the 1996-2008 period. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(1), 8-21.
  37. Serenko, A., Cocosila, M. & Turel, O. (2008). The state and evolution of information systems research in Canada: a scientometric analysis. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 25 (4), 279-94.
  38. Sevukan, R. et. al. (2007). Research Output of Faculties of Plant Sciences in Central Universities of India: a Bibliometric Study, Annals of Library and Information Sciences, 54, 129-139.
  39. Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J.S., and Ramakrishnan, T. (2008). Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 467-482.
  40. Stanely, M. H. R., et al. (1995). Zipf’s plot and the size distribution of firms. Economic Letters, 49, 453-457.
  41. Subramanian, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review; Journal of Information Science, 6 (1), 33-38.
  42. Zinkhan, G. M., & Leigh, T. W. (1999). Assessing the Quality Ranking of the Journal of Advertising: 1986-1997. Journal of Advertising, 2(28), 51-70.

Abstract

The present study is modeled with the purpose to explore the quantitative and qualitative assessment of global Management Information System (MIS) research by using various bibliometric indicators on International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) journal literature. It examines and presents an analysis of 180 research communications published during the period 1999-2009 in the area of MIS. The present study significantly examines the various bibliometric dimensions of the journal literature such as growth of literature, authorship pattern, degree of collaboration, authors’ productivity, geographical distribution, citation pattern, length of articles, institution-wise distribution of articles, journal matrix, discipline-wise distributions of articles, productive institutions and prolific authors etc.

Download

Share

COinS