Date of this Version
Tyler, David C. Tyler, Cross, Jeanne, & DeFrain, Erica. (2017). Sociological Abstracts vs. SocINDEX for Graduate Students in Sociology: Comprehensive Enough to Satisfy? Library Philosophy and Practice.
In 2005, EBSCO introduced a comprehensive database for sociology that could be a competitor for Sociological Abstracts, SocINDEX/SocINDEX with Full Text. Library science quickly produced a product review, a few general comparative analyses of the two, and a few comparative analyses of the databases’ utility for particular populations of researchers/students. The authors hope to add to this literature with an analysis of the databases’ utility for graduate students in sociology completing their theses and dissertations. The citation checking variation of the checklist method was employed for four random samples of cited items, and the authors’ sampling frame was theses and dissertations accepted at Southern Illinois University Carbondale and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln during the 2000-2010 interval. The authors found that neither database provided particularly good coverage of the literature cited, that SocINDEX provided superior coverage of cited peer-reviewed journal articles, that neither database provided impressive coverage of other sorts of literature, and that SocINDEX’s broader approach to indexing subjects of interest to sociologists could be beneficial to graduate students in sociology.
Title page with author info
DTyler_SocAbsSocInd_TABLE 1_LibPhilPractice.docx (12 kB)
DTyler_SocAbsSocInd_TABLE 2_LibPhilPractice.docx (13 kB)
DTyler_SocAbsSocInd_TABLE 3a_LibPhilPractice.docx (13 kB)
DTyler_SocAbsSocInd_TABLE 3b_LibPhilPractice.docx (13 kB)
DTyler_SocAbsSocInd_TABLE 4_LibPhilPractice.docx (12 kB)
DTyler_SocAbsSocInd_TABLE 5_LibPhilPractice.docx (13 kB)
DTyler_SocAbsSocInd_TABLE 6_LibPhilPractice.docx (14 kB)
DTyler_SocAbsSocInd_TABLE 7_LibPhilPractice.docx (13 kB)
DTyler_SocAbsSocInd_TABLE 8_LibPhilPractice.docx (13 kB)
DTyler_SocAbsSocInd_TABLE 9_LibPhilPractice.docx (13 kB)