Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

 

Date of this Version

Winter 2017

Document Type

Article

Citation

  1. Anyi, K. W., Zainab, A. N., & Anuar, N. B. (2009). Bibliometric studies on single journals: a review. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 14(1), 17-55.
  2. Asha, N., & Anil, K. (2010). A bibliometric study of journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 47 (1).
  3. Bakri, A., & Willett, P. (2008). The Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 2001-2006: A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 13(1), 103-116.
  4. Barik, N., and Jena, P. (2013). Bibliometric Analysis of Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 2008-2012. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal).
  5. Biswas, B. C., Roy, A., & Sen, B. K. (2007). Economic Botany: A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 12 (1), 23-33.
  6. Das, T. K. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of contributions in the journal Library Trends. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1014/
  7. Isiakpona, C. D. (2012). Bibliometric Analysis of the Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal from 2004 to 2010. Library Student Journal, 2012(9). Retrieved from http://www.librarystudentjournal.org/index.php/lsj/article/view/301/360
  8. Jena K. L. (2006). A bibliometric analysis of the journal 'Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research, 1996–2004. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 53 (1), 22-30.
  9. Jena, K. L., Swain, D. K., & Sahoo, K. C. (2012). Annals of Library and Information Studies, 2002–2010: A Bibliometric Study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/716/
  10. Kumar, M., & Murty, A. L. (2011). Bibliometric Analysis of DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology during 2001-2010. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 31, (3), 203-208.
  11. Panda, J., Mohanty, B., & Sahoo, J. (2011). Mapping of Publication Pattern of IASLIC Bulletin: A decade’s Analysis (2000-2009). IASLIC Bulletin, 56(3), 234-243.
  12. Pandita, R. (2014). DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology (DJLIT): A Bibliometric Study (2003-12). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1038/
  13. Roy, S. B., & Basak, M. (2013). Journal of Documentation: A Bibliometric Study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/945/
  14. Sahoo, J., & Mohanty, B. (2002). Communication Pattern in the Journal Studies in Conservation: A Bibliometric Analysis, ILA Bulletin, 38(3), 98 – 105.
  15. Saravanan G., & Dominic, J. (2014). A Ten-year Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology (2003 – 2012). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1109/
  16. Suresh, L., & Nigam, S. (2005). Journal of Health Management: A Bibliometric Study. Journal of Health Management, 7, 157-162.
  17. Tella, A., & Olabooye, A. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science from 2000-2012. Library Review, 63(4/5), 305 – 32.
  18. Thanuskodi, S. (2009). Bibliometric Analysis of the Indian Journal of Chemistry. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 29(6), 39-44
  19. Thanuskodi, S. (2010). Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal Library Philosophy and Practice from 2005-2009. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/437/
  20. Thanuskodi, S. (2011). Library Herald Journal: A Bibliometric Study. Researchers World-Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, II(4), 68-76.
  21. Tiew, W. S. (1997). Single Journal Bibliometric Studies: A Review. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 2(2), 93-114
  22. Tiew, W. S., Abdullah, A., & Kaur, K. (2002). Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 1996-2000: A Bibliometric Study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 6(2), 43-56
  23. Tsay, M. (2008). Journal bibliometric analysis: A case study on the JASIST. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 13(2), 121-139
  24. Tsay, M. (2011). A Bibliometric Analysis on the Journal of Information Science. Journal of Library and Information Science Research, 5(2), 1-28.
  25. Tsay, M., & Shu, Z. (2011). Journal bibliometric analysis: A case study on the Journal of Documentation. Journal of Documentation, 67(5), 806–822.
  26. Verma, N., & Tamrakar, R. (2013). Analysis of Contributions to Defence Science Journal. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal).
  27. Vijay, K. R., & Raghavan I. (2007). Journal of Food Science and Technology: A bibliometric Study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 54, 207-212.
  28. Warraich, N. F., & Ahmad, S. (2011). Pakistan Journal of Library and Information Science: A Bibliometric Analysis. Pakistan Journal of Library & Information Science, 12. Retrieved from http://pu.edu.pk/home/journal/8
  29. Willett, P. (2008). A bibliometric analysis of the literature of chemo-informatics. ASLIB Proceedings: New Information Perspectives. 60 (1), 4-17.
  30. Zao, et al. (2007). Scholarly Communication in Educational Psychology: A journal citation analysis. Collection Building, 26 (4):112-118.

Abstract

The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management (EJKM) is an online open access peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles with regard to the development of both theory and practice in the field of Knowledge Management. The present paper examines the articles published in EJKM during the period from 2003-13 for identifying the publication output, authorship pattern, degree of collaboration, most prolific contributors, geographical distribution of papers, referencing pattern, self citation pattern and several other characteristics. The results of this study reveal that that the year 2009 is the most productive year, research papers are given more importance than other categories of publications. Majority of papers are multi- authored. The degree of collaboration is found to be 0.70. The geographical distribution reveals that the contribution by United Kingdom is highest.

Download

Share

COinS