Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Document Type
Article
Citation
Anna Guidry, J. (2002), LibQUAL+TM spring 2001 comments: a qualitative analysis using Atlas.ti. Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 100–107. http://doi.org/10.1108/14678040210429008
Asemi, A., Kazempour, Z., & Ashrafi Rizi, H. (2010), Using LibQUAL +TM to improve services to libraries. The Electronic Library, Vol. 28 No 4, pp. 568–579. http://doi.org/10.1108/02640471011065382
Babakus, E., & Boller, G. W. (1992), An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 253–268.
Brady, M. K., Cronin, J., & Brand, R. R. (2002), Performance-only measurement of service quality: a replication and extension. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00171-5
Brochado, A. (2009), Comparing alternative instruments to measure service quality in higher education, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 174-90.
Cristobal, Arlyn Selga (2018),Expectations on Library Services, Library Quality (LibQual) Dimension and Library Customer Satisfaction: Relationship to Customer Loyalty. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1706. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1706
de Lourdes Machado, M., Brites, R., Magalhães, A., & Sá, M. J. (2011), Satisfaction with Higher Education: critical data for student development. European Journal of Education, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 415–432. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01489.x
Dole, W. (2002), LibQUAL + and the small academic library. Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 85–95. http://doi.org/10.1108/14678040210440982
Duffy, J.S., Jaggars, D.E. and Smith, S.E. (2008), Getting our priorities in order: are our service values in line with the communities we serve? Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 171-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040810928408
Heinrichs, J. H., Sharkey, T., & Lim, J.-S. (2005), Relative Influence of the LibQUAL+TM Dimensions on Satisfaction: A Subgroup Analysis. College & Research Libraries, Vol. 66 No. 3, pp. 248–265. http://doi.org/10.5860/crl.66.3.248
Helgesen, Ø., & Nesset, E. (2011), Does LibQUAL+ TM account for student loyalty to a university college library? Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 19 No.4, pp. 413–440. http://doi.org/10.1108/09684881111170104
Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001), Place attachment: Conceptual and Empirical Questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 273–281. http://doi.org/10.1006/JEVP.2001.0221
Hudson, S., Hudson, P., & Miller, G. A. (2004), The Measurement of Service Quality in the Tour Operating Sector: A Methodological Comparison. Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 305–312. http://doi.org/10.1177/0047287503258839
Hughes, K. (1991). Tourist Satisfaction: A Guided “Cultural” Tour in North Queensland. Australian Psychologist, Vol. 26 No.3, 166–171. http://doi.org/10.1080/00050069108257243
Jankowska, M. A., Hertel, K., & Young, N. J. (2006), Improving Library Service a Practical Setting. Portal Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 6 No. 11, pp. 59–77. http://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2006.0005
Karim, Sazzadul, ." (2018)."Library Performance Measurement: a study of Dhaka University residential hall libraries, Bangladesh, Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1831.https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/183
Khan, B. (2016), Performance Audit through LibQUAL+ Technique: The Experience of Burdwan University and Visva-Bharati Library Users. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1406
Killick, S., van Weerden, A., & van Weerden, F. (2014), Using LibQUAL+® to identify commonalities in customer satisfaction: the secret to success?. Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 15 No. 1/2, pp. 23–31. http://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-04-2014-0012
Kline, P. (1984). An easy guide to factor analysis. 1994. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge,
Kuo, Y.C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013), A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 16. http://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
Lee, H., Lee, Y., & Yoo, D. (2000). The determinants of perceived service quality and its relationship with satisfaction. Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 217–231. http://doi.org/10.1108/08876040010327220
Lippincott, S., & Kyrillidou, M. (2004). How ARL university communities access information: highlights from LibQual+™. ARL Bimonthly Report, 236, pp. 7-8.
Maughan, P. D. (1999). Library resources and services: a cross-disciplinary survey of faculty and graduate student use and satisfaction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol.25 No. 5, pp. 354-366.
Moon, A. (2007), LibQUAL+ TM at Rhodes University Library. Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 72–87. http://doi.org/10.1108/14678040710760586
Morales, M., Ladhari, R., Reynoso, J., Toro, R., & Sepulveda, C. (2011), Factor structure and psychometric properties of a Spanish version of LibQUAL+TM. Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 23–37. http://doi.org/10.1108/14678041111124270
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). Servqual: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perc. Journal of retailing, Vol.64 No.1, pp. 12-40
Pedramnia, S., Modiramani, P., & Ghavami Ghanbarabadi, V. (2012, An analysis of service quality in academic libraries using LibQUAL scale. Library Management, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 159–167. http://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211217144
Roszkowski, M. J., Baky, J. S., & Jones, D. B. (2005), So which score on the LibQual+TM tells me if library users are satisfied? Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 424–439. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.LISR.2005.08.002
Saunders, E.S. (2008), Drilling the LibQUAL+ data for strategic planning, Performance Measurements and Metrics, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 160-70. http://doi.org/10.1108/14678040810928390
Sahu, A. K. (2007), Measuring service quality in an academic library: an Indian case study. Library Review, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 234–243. http://doi.org/10.1108/00242530710736019
Thomas, E. H., & Galambos, N. (2004), What satisfies students? Mining students-opinion data with regression and decision tree analysis. Research in Higher Education, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 251–269. http://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000019589.79439.6e
Tipton, C. J. (2001). Graduate students' perceptions of library support services for distance learners: a university system-wide study. Journal of Library Administration, 32(1-2), 393-408.
Veasna, U., Chun, M., & Nimol, N. (2015), Effect of LibQUAL dimensions on library user satisfaction: Evidence from Cambodia, Journal of Business Administration and Management Sciences Research, Vol. 4 No. 7, pp. 152–165.
Westbrook, R. A., & Newman, J. W. (1978), An Analysis of Shopper Dissatisfaction for Major Household Appliances. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 15 No. 8, pp. 456–467. http://doi.org/10.2307/3150594
Yüksel, A., & Rimmington, M. (1998), Customer-Satisfaction Measurement. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Vol. 39 No. 6, pp. 60–70. http://doi.org/10.1177/001088049803900611
Zhang, Y. L., Bi, R. F., & Xiao, M. (2017), Studying on Enhancing Readers’ Satisfaction Model of Electronic Service Quality in Library Based on LibQUAL+ and Kano. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 174, pp. 260–266. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.132
Ziaei, soraya and Ranjgar Korjan, Fateme, (2018) "Assessment of services quality in Tabriz central library from the users’ point of view based on LibQual model”. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1799. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1799
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to identify the significant dimension of LibQUAL+ that has a greater influence on hospitality students’ satisfaction towards the quality of the overall service provided by a library. Authors of this study have used a modified (a shorter performance-only) LibQUAL+ tool to measure the perceived service quality of a library. The data for this study is collected from both graduate and post-graduate students from a single hospitality institute in Karnataka, India. The regression analysis is used to test the hypotheses. “Affect of Service” emerged as a significant dimension accounting for hospitality students’ satisfaction. The study gives practical insights to library managers about students’ perceptions of service quality for improved decision-making and helps them to reallocate human resources effectively by identifying the most important predictor of library service quality.