Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln


Date of this Version

Winter 9-25-2018


1-Available at (accessed on 16 jan 2017)

2-O'NEILL, G Patrick, (1998) Authorship patterns in theory based versus research-based journals, Scientometrics, 41 (3), p. 291-298.

3-Gupta B M, Munshi U M, & Mishra, P K, (2002) S &T collaboration of India with other South Asian countries, Current Science, 83(10), p. 1201-09.

4-Sevukan R, & Sharma J, (2008) Bibliometric analysis of research output of biotechnology faculties in some Indian central universities, DESIDOC J. of Lib. & Inf. Technology, 28(6), p. 11-20.

5-Gopikuttan A, & S Aswathy, (2014) Publication Productivity of the University of Kerala: A Scientometric View, DESIDOC J. of Lib. & Inf. Technology, 34(2), p. 131-39.

6-Biradar B S, (2006) Indian Journal of Environmental Protection: A study of citation pattern, Annals Lib. Inf. studies, 53, p. 109-13.

7-Singh J K, (2014) A scientometric analysis of Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics (2006-2010): A study based on web of science, Res. J. Lib. sci., 2 (1) p. 7-12.

8-PRICE, Derek J deSolla, (1963) Little science, Big science,( New York: Columbia press), pp.78.

9- Available at (accessed on 13 jan-2017)

10-De Solla Price D, & Beaver D B, (1966) Collaboration in an invisible college, American Psychologist, 21(11), p. 1011-18.

11- Ajiferuke I, Burrel Q & Tague J, (1988) Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research, Scientometrics,14(5-6), p. 421-33.

12. Schubert A and Braun T, (1986) Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact, Scientometrics, 9 p. 281- 291.

13. Price, D De Solla, (1981) The analysis of scientometrics for policy implications, Scientometrics, 3 p. 47-54.

14. Karki M M S and Garg K C, (1997) Bibliometrics of Alkaloid Chemistry research in India, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 37 p. 157-161.


The study presents the trends in authorship pattern and author collaborative in the Biotechnology research field with the sample of 18119 articles which collected from Scopus database for the year 2007 to 2016. The search string used for data download is same for all country and all data downloaded for each country. The three scientometric tools; Collaboration Coefficient, Authorship pattern and Activity Index have been used for the data analysis. The multi- authorship articles are greater than single authorship. The study found that the researchers in Biotechnology move towards team research or group research rather than solo research. The average Activity Index of four SAARC countries for ten years’ time spam is highest for India and lowest counted for Sri Lanka followed by Pakistan and Bangladesh at the 3rd and 4th place. The international collaboration shows that the United States has taken the top position for India and Sri Lanka, another hand China important for Pakistan and Bangladesh contributed with Japan.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.