Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

 

Date of this Version

Winter 12-25-2018

Document Type

Article

Citation

  1. Bagalkoti, V. T., & Hosamani, S. C. (2014). Mapping of the Indian Research Productivity of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology: A Scientometric Analysis. Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science, 3(3), 249-256.
  2. Hosamani, M. S. C., & Bagalkoti, V. T. (2014). Scientometric Analysis of Indian Engineering Literature during 1999-2013. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5(5).
  3. Bhattacharya, S., Shilpa, & Bhati, M. (2012). China and India: The two new players in the nanotechnology race. Scientometrics, 93(1), 59-87. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-012-06517.
  4. Chaman Sab, M., Dharani Kumar, P., & Biradar, B. S. (2017). Assessment of Chemical Science Research output Using Scientometric Indicators. Asian Journal of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2(2), 10 -15. doi:10.18311/ajcps/2017/20185.
  5. Chaman Sab, M., Dharani Kumar, P., & Biradar, B. S. (2017). Scientometric Dimensions of Chemical engineering research in india with reference to web of science citation database. Review Of Research, 6(4), 1-8. Retrieved from www.lsrj.in
  6. Elango, B., & Rajendran, P. (2015). Global tribology research output (1998 2012): A macro level scientometric study. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 3(4), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1633/ JISTaP.2015.3.4.3
  7. Gupta, B. M., Kshitij, A., & Verma, C. (2011). Mapping of Indian computer science research output, 19992008. Scientometrics, 86(2), 261-283. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-010- rea. Scientometrics, 110(1), 105-112. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-016-21798.
  8. Gupta, B.M., & Gupta, P. (2004). Analysis of India’s S&T research capabilities and international collaborative strength, particularly in context of India-Germann collaboration, New Delhi:DFG India.
  9. Hadagali, G. S., & Anandhalli, G. (2015). Modeling thegrowth of neurology literature. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 3(3), 45-63.
  10. Kim, M. J. (2002). Citation patterns of Korean physicists and mechanical engineers: Difference by type of publication source and type of authorship. Scientometrics, 55(3), 421 – 436. https;//doi.org/10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.8.
  11. Liu, F., Lin, A., Wang, H., Peng, Y., & Hong, S. (2016). Global research trends of geographical information system from 1961 to 2010: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 106(2), 751-768. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-015- 1789-x
  12. Nobre, G. C., & Tavares, E. (2017). Scientific literature analysis on big data and internet of things applications on circular economy: A bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 111(1), 463-492. Retrieved from http:// link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-017-2281-6
  13. Ravichandra Rao, I. K., & Suma, M. P. (1999). A quantitative study of Indian engineering literature. Scientometrics, 46(3), 605-619.
  14. Sangam, S. L., Keshava, & Agadi, A. B. (2010). Growth pattern of marine engineering literature. Information Studies, 16(2), 113-120.
  15. Schoepflin, U., & Glanzel, W. (2001). Two decades of “Scientometrics”. An interdisciplinary field represented by its leading journal. Scientometrics, 50(2), 301-312,https;//doi.org/01.1023/A:1010577824449.
  16. Singhal, K., Banshal, S. K., Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2015). A Scientometric analysis of computer science research in India. In 2015 Eighth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3) (pp. 177-182).
  17. Zou, Y., & Laubichler, M. D. (2017). Measuring the contributions of Chinese scholars to the research field of systems Biology from 2005 to 2013. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1615-1631.
  18. Reddy KS, Sahni P, Pande GK, Numdy S. Research in Indian medical institutes. Natl Med J India 1991;4:90-2.
  1. Arora M, Banerjee JK, Sahni P, Pande GK, Nundy S. Which are the best undergraduate medical colleges in India? Natl Med J India 1996;9:135-40.
  2. Deo MG. Undergraduate medical students research in India. J Postgrad Med 2008;54:176-9.
  3. Satyanarayana K. Final Report of the project on National Mapping of Science: Biomedical Sciences. Information Today and Tomorrow.;19(1):17-21. Available from: htt p://itt .nissat.tripod.com/ itt 2001/nmsbio.htm [Last accessed on March 2000].
  4. Srivastava D, Diwakar S. Changing face of Indian Medical Research: A collaboration analysis of papers from SCI (1999 and 2007) In: H Kretschmer, F Havermann, editors. Proc of WIS 2008, Berlin Fourth Intl Conf on Webometrics, Informatics and Scientometrics and Ninth COLLNET meeting Humboldt-University zu Berlin: Institute for Library and Information Science; 2008.
  5. Kundra R. Investigation of collaborative research trends in Indian medical sciences, 1900-1945. Scientometrics 1996;36:69-80.
  6. Dutt B, Kumar S, Garg KC. Mapping of Plant-based medical research in China and India. Res Eval 2009;18:51-9.
  7. Arunachalam S. Research if relevance matt ered? Medical research in India as refl ected in SCI 1981-85. In. ISSI: Proceedings of the 5th Biennial International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. River Forest, IL, 7-10 June 1995. Illionois, USA: 1995. p. 33-42.
  8. Arunachalam S. How relevant is research done in India? A study based on MEDLINE. Curr Sci 1997;72:912-22.
  9. Dandona L, Sivan YS, Jyothi MN, Bhasker VS, Dandona R. The lack of public health research output from India. BMC Public Health 2004;4:55. Available from: htt p://www.biomedcentral.com/1471- 2458/4/55
  10. Dandona L, Raban MZ, Guggilla RK, Bhatnagar A, Dandona R. Trends of the public health research output from India during 2001- 2008. BMC Med 2009;7:59.
  11. Sahni P, Reddy PP, Ravi K, Reddy KS, Pandey GK, Nundy S. Indian medical journals. Lancet 1992;339:1589-91.
  12. Jain NC. Growing visibility of Indian biomedicine and life science journals in global alerting services. In: H Kretschmer, F Havermann, editors. Proc of WIS 2008, Berlin Fourth Intl Conf on Webometrics, Informatics and Scientometrics and Ninth COLLNET meeting Humboldt-University zu Berlin: Institute for Library and Information science. 2008. Available from: htt p:// www.collnet.de/ Berlin_2008/Jain WIS gvi.pdf
  13. Pandya S. Why the output of medical research from India is is low? BMJ 1990; 301:333.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to qualitative analyse of medicine research output using select scientometric indicators with the aim of identifying top preparing countries, subject subthemes, organisations, authors and journals in the area. The present study has examined 29153 publications in medicine research, the present study deals with the Assessment of Indian medicine research output as reflected in Web of Science (WOS) database for the period 2009 to 2018 for identifying the research output in the field of medicine literature. It also provides a comparative evaluation and performance of different types of scientometric indicators, such as number of publications, number of citations, relative growth, doubling time, activity index and collaboration from India. The Indian medicine research has increased exponentially over the last decade.

Download

Share

COinS